From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B469253B4E; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744905397; cv=none; b=na44gu9tE5WX60vXgE0k8lxd1rpz2YaxmLXL51X17nvE/S1mA0fRdKNMKWjlDC9oIQ0vrI4THRrd0CUo/25d+8bycR5km38cgu9IEeZS7409ge69hs4w4+HgLQ82xdrtmG12iX3dwh55S5t73wNyHnyeKXid3C4EcMiD10rCS2g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744905397; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uldIoo2ppczQb9y0R5Iyi2s+eQoDhHt8SZj5mwVhK+4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sP3J3PLSsU8JIF0R0Zcrei8yi6H9WIVooMEfiYKMMOyU6yvXNtLkyA/h2S2rDMAuuA4Gf3yfCjfUt/7UbBSeEX6lUCySgAoNq98nPTJK/exztyvm6MDjH5wLhk3k0JaKPBxbolG6ovjRhcfJtlRMJbC7kP7qAK20LqpOdRXQDnE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fUkzKRA/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fUkzKRA/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744905396; x=1776441396; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uldIoo2ppczQb9y0R5Iyi2s+eQoDhHt8SZj5mwVhK+4=; b=fUkzKRA/q9WdT2oj/zY8DDQKovLBUvgFTnQ71qQEWwGdpKVWhki0EHCu a/wbSZhG5DZBFWCkvSylfu3QsR+dkgpahxD9dg3uMMX8jOD5vkv0hEMYv 3r+ij0iEEwwOdni5TNuj3NEFB52bOejrSFo7e5jQksWN+6aqNwrWu5AqB /M+X9iP4koCCmJDbCb65i7cPhlq3S8eg55aHjLmcKR/UU7g959liEA6zp Uwmv2NAJMevVJZPySVV6aW5ubOZirsb9VhVEH4Y3m2A3xDTZ4tYHaXDQb SWLsFQLfgbfJ0zGS8C5SpwuGwKzgnw7/rdEUzkjQAToVJqcdT8vSXhAoQ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: A+9NiFhfQRqE6sffJ0rhvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SC7l47ZRQqinInbNWTATBQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11406"; a="57887199" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="57887199" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 08:56:35 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WxsXR6KER5KP3y85PdRo+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: urzKjAbSRbW4BPr5G6qR5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="130603333" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 08:56:34 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5RbL-0000000DFC7-1VZZ; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:56:31 +0300 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:56:31 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the gpio-intel tree Message-ID: References: <20250417154447.642f2ec4@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250417154447.642f2ec4@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:44:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the gpio-brgl tree as different commits > (but the same patches): > > 8f4543e980ff ("gpio: ich: use new line value setter callbacks") > b7a49fd57be3 ("gpio: graniterapids: use new line value setter callbacks") > > These are commits > > 69e230a0a288 ("gpio: ich: use new line value setter callbacks") > 04eaa41eb8eb ("gpio: graniterapids: use new line value setter callbacks") > > in the gpio-bgrl tree. I expect that gpio-bgrl should drop these. Bart? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko