From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D70235973; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744909412; cv=none; b=sDvziscmVx7eml58SCmo02whDJl4SKFsm3kPCywM+GgDv0PPiI++c1nC8pEtwhGtSpQrxXMgj9wleIHfJmak+DeXC+g5mIsMvheu38XIZe6ENA8DMD09Qd86W+ary3+7tNDjolG88s/eHiHCWN7SbDrrJZeyheB4gGFH5go+k08= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744909412; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u2TJkLbhGbp9zkKfbZRts2Ws5XA9d12/sGNpfBxof9U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AI/V4VB0YWh09b/nrpojZaywugQNNd0XUOr67r+MnDS1BiOSBGrInRgNDwX/Cf2FZEEcy3645r125TxzrCkK33w8MuE/Iiuz2kfxXfI9Vf7Zv9MY5BQwcafjxyWzbljOf+dJlQmSBbC49a1IMR7pEQzSat4OzjG6hp3jiTkce24= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TQihoqV9QCyn/3I6M456Vw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ww7mvA3YSS6c4MKkoXzkjg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11406"; a="45752721" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="45752721" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 10:01:20 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qOifIojCTIq+nHVmW37Phw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OZhLABtgTd29swPzawq8jg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="131754336" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 10:01:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Sbx-0000000DGCi-27qC; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:01:13 +0300 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:01:13 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: David Lechner Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Cosmin Tanislav , Tomasz Duszynski , Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol , Andreas Klinger , Petre Rodan , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] iio: more timestamp alignment Message-ID: References: <20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:52:32AM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use > aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with > iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(). > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/ Link: URL [1] :-) This will help to maintainer with b4 as it manages tags. > Signed-off-by: David Lechner Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko for non-commented patches. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko