From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B0E155C82; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744970435; cv=none; b=LCQucW1E6uZl4Gw3k5MbtNG+E0stCbOnDqKPjWH4MNQ2giTbc37ypSYjFxJmRyFZT+pn8R4eKyBLh+/rLMB+Io24qiV1G5ZGebVVlN9BNjZ4pre0kD+Pi3ReIq9UBLr8ize5T9AvPdbcfFr3fSfAs12Fktjbr8FITrKZJYVPZzM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744970435; c=relaxed/simple; bh=irvX3Kf4X756JsU0YCDL86boKYBb6LyTE8yrOMOi7Jg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=N1et5oqjn0dnbfByy31Bp92TXaw9ZviICFaohFdP11GHl1V8F2nvcqZfSAsun0m5dMs5Ma9zzRA9b8yPMgQNcmSaDG5Nx76vfIGTOPqGfQynzngDUZ4h4NulUNyChL3vRGLU71wJ5oBg+6UF+oiIU+DKEzHHYatEig/3u6EQEmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=XLMkvjJr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XLMkvjJr" Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39c30d9085aso1242103f8f.1; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1744970431; x=1745575231; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lmdzOyBKySkqBAKKcD6PgWQb4+yfqKbUqL+8us9T71s=; b=XLMkvjJrn5CRZ3aLliHTz2oXqY4lbrdXiHucvCnZQTJsMvxW5/gQMeI5HjLK45evu4 CoByG0jcPkE8k4T0eA1hUB5vJw875P6zNrVN/ERxFWKNOUFt9icO/yu+DWjWvNELWInX WONJptKfo3VGBgwhh/rrhqzIe9V5DW75icG+ll/vbxGkq8Pe2kY9bYrVASxy+1tBmIe3 KsFI/hS+mto3sso5xNv1rP14Dd3axgxQ9ddvu2k64nGXMspyNnKEQm9uYm+WhKWIFLVO RmjcqDcvdU4B1AcTrV8htDbQgVnk+Uw3KdXNsXHi5eswn/3rIdqiCf1M0l1MCp4ywiSE k+fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744970431; x=1745575231; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lmdzOyBKySkqBAKKcD6PgWQb4+yfqKbUqL+8us9T71s=; b=wbo4rzRRC/Hc/yRP7oLMW7lA7XElJDI5MzWJvmuphGhlU4/4kcP0V4ctSCgql53SgZ XXvgZ4rrLmr7mv38Zwy1b2u1AHOtQ2q36oW1/zKDxVsPAfuNNx49aHeiKdIe4d6QwSuh z8FlMZeum63C8lxeuZ5YSNmnxnex0LSUO/kduGLI+Hnb5wEOszjCubf4ZuMDu81e4Phq y7QIOaYxfRXLx0urvXOSO90QXMEGQ5n9xP06lCEfl0L+nXgCbxTiuomDZYImeAJqFac5 1fZviR8TEw5yz/yJ/Jkh+q+/ioGtqmr7okIleO6xiUHpP1AqISQY3hKezp7t2r/KN3Qs eHvg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVNpjxu98PojO9Q+vpcSKNPb5cWuvghxhuZBYzuh5i6maPPwqITRMEDqouAHh7q56sxt5x0hRMpBqymDHY=@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCXdYjsnYRqkgqwMWZxCbllh9v6pcXbQH4FRWegYnAlywFzmadfjR51cogkA6LmI04mwcd/PW5zHeZlpgbBiia8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw0rzm2Q4ubBxeN/AcFC/0H1jLMwoI6OIAp5o9t74xLxywOiJW4 JNQqCx4omtbJqmkWaWtlYzUxrBBscLoHVA4qN4+gd9UadKGeVFFT X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvpI9hizMhj1EX/6ZxDU9MwLqYo1zA51GCf2BtoBKHo9aFJOiQkEcGaseIPXqM pYCKmv3DqHfqMo9iBwIoRKGAWK9HnJlGvuGvwwiTNArFINlZBSZz17VD+oXoDk7Zn8FhUTDgkwr hCRD5PIATJ+iymAicLEs5XaHZ/nDso9QbdzaL6/iydvCQz/qdDdNN9QVm7GrFWFJx7EfWs7VPic BrVTkfSciFtaFkNhsbX0fURdnbCAX9M47KwYd/SXQVPtkoYu6QSBMUvHFkvzlSP2gMOknQ8TfcE FdJ2fb3lm1ibdh+/VyO35QIPrrwCoh/OCdRfXwjyWVSbdyYRQnj22M3bE7oAsG/wQKmITQokV8L B1tDDhiNp7vjJYD8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGI5khHQIWwIC8A0ujecRvJNh/8dd2rdMdf6ZZWOg9tPpvImGZXGtcFwEzmElLefwyL9zx9yg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2d12:b0:39e:cbe0:4cd0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39efba399a4mr1021492f8f.7.1744970430670; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-brnt4-2-0-cust862.4-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.9.131.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39efa493124sm2279882f8f.68.2025.04.18.03.00.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:00:28 +0100 From: Stafford Horne To: Sahil Siddiq Cc: jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, sahilcdq@proton.me, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH] openrisc: Fix build warning in cache.c Message-ID: References: <20250401200129.287769-1-sahilcdq@proton.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:42:20PM +0530, Sahil Siddiq wrote: > Hi Stafford, > > On 4/18/25 1:17 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:39:22AM +0530, Sahil Siddiq wrote: > > [...] > > Hi Sahil, > > > > Sorry for delay in getting back on this. > > No worries :) > > > I was working on getting this patches ready for upstreaming and noticed one > > thing: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ./patches/or1k-20250418/0001-openrisc-Refactor-struct-cpuinfo_or1k-to-reduce-dupl.patch > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Sahil Siddiq ' != 'Signed-off-by: Sahil Siddiq ' > > > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 102 lines checked > > > > As you can see above the scripts/checkpatch.pl is failing with the warning > > about your email and signed-off-by not matching. You can see more about it > > in the FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH section of the checkpatch[0] docs. > > Ok, this makes sense. I configured git-send-email to use gmail because > protonmail does not work with git-send-email without a paid account. > > > How would you like to resolve this? > > Is this a warning that cannot be ignored? I can: > > 1. submit the patch series with another email address that won't have issues > with git-send-email, or > 2. submit the patch series using protonmail's web client (which might not be > the best option). > > I would prefer not to use "icegambit91" in the signed-off-by tag. > > What are your thoughts on this? I could rewrite the from header to match sahilcdq@proton.me. But if I do that you should find a way to get proton.me to work with gi-send-email [0] for future commits. It seems this can work using the Protonmail Bridge[1], though this site also says proton.me is not so good for using with git send email. Maybe using another email in signed-off-by would be better. The current patches are on linux-next[2] where we can see the From/Signed-off-by mismatch. For example: author Sahil Siddiq 2025-03-29 15:16:22 +0530 committer Stafford Horne 2025-03-29 10:22:21 +0000 commit af83ece87a1ef5097434b7c3c1fc0e9e7b83b192 (patch) ... Signed-off-by: Sahil Siddiq Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne -Stafford [0] https://git-send-email.io/#step-2 [1] https://proton.me/mail/bridge [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/arch/openrisc