Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm

Petr Mladek
2025-04-09T15:30:17Z

On Tue 2025-04-08 12:38:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:52:10AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > > On 8 Apr 2025, at 2:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:17:13PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > >> The vsprint patch was originally being sent as a seperate patch [1], and
> > >> I was waiting it to be taken up. But as suggested by Petr, I'm sending
> > >> them via DRM.
> > >
> > > You need to do something about your tools, really.
> >
> > Uhh, I'll just revert to the tried and tested macOS mail.
> >
> > Although I don't think a resend is necessary here now.
>
> I dunno. If people are using `b4`, it might mess up the patch ordering,
> I haven't checked this myself (it depends if it takes [PATCH x/y] or message
> threading into account first).

JFYI, it seems that b4 handles this correctly. AFAIK, it checks the
[PATCH x/y] in subjects.

But I am not sure what DRM guys are using. I guess that they are using
patchwork. I am not sure how it handles this...

Best Regards,
Petr