Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm

Aditya Garg
2025-04-21T13:54:54Z

On 21-04-2025 07:19 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> I didn't realize this was so subtle with the backporting. I don't think
> I can take this on, sorry.

Any change needed or just because some other maintainer manages this? Although Tbh, I really don't care about backporting since T2 Mac users are still using patched kernels provided by us. I'd rather free my mind in getting this done.
>
> Le Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:40:23PM +0530, Aditya Garg a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 21-04-2025 06:38 pm, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21-04-2025 06:37 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>>>>> On 21-04-2025 05:35 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>>>>>>> Can I have a feedback from some DRM maintainer on this? AFAIK merge window is over for some time now. It's been more than a week and last time when I submitted, it just stayed in the mailing list without any feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DRM hides the merge window from committers so that's not super relevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a DRM committer and can pick this up if necessary but it's not
>>>>>> clear to me what's going thru with DRM vs elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the three patches are intended to go through DRM. IIRC Petr, the vsprintf maintainers had requested for that to be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> The relevant patches have been Reviewed-by Petr as well.
>>>>
>>>> OK, will queue this today.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Also, Petr has requested them to be backported for 6.15
>>
>> To be more clear, he does not have objection for backporting to 6.15. Although its your call.
>>