Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm

Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-08T09:39:00Z

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:52:10AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 8 Apr 2025, at 2:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:17:13PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >> The vsprint patch was originally being sent as a seperate patch [1], and
> >> I was waiting it to be taken up. But as suggested by Petr, I'm sending
> >> them via DRM.
> >
> > You need to do something about your tools, really.
>
> Uhh, I'll just revert to the tried and tested macOS mail.
>
> Although I don't think a resend is necessary here now.

I dunno. If people are using `b4`, it might mess up the patch ordering,
I haven't checked this myself (it depends if it takes [PATCH x/y] or message
threading into account first).

It seems not a big deal with _this_ series, but for the future it may be really
a problem (esp. from [runtime] bisectability point of view).

> > Now it's patch 3 threaded to patch 1, while the rest, including cover letter,
> > seems okay.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko