From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
heiko@sntech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:47:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAeB7fO_LCzi-xCh@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422112830.204374-3-18255117159@163.com>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:28:29PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> Register definitions were scattered with ambiguous names (e.g.,
> PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED in PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC) and lacked
> hierarchical grouping. Magic values for bit operations reduced code
> clarity.
>
> Group registers and their associated bitfields logically. This improves
> maintainability and aligns the code with hardware documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 42 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index fd5827bbfae3..cdc8afc6cfc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> * Author: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> */
>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> @@ -34,30 +35,35 @@
>
> #define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x04
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0)
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8)
> +
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x4
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
> +
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC 0x10
> +#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
> +#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
> +
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC 0x24
> +
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_POWER 0x2c
> +#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
> +
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN 0x34
> -#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3)
> -#define PME_TURN_OFF (BIT(4) | BIT(20))
> -#define PME_TO_ACK (BIT(9) | BIT(25))
> -#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16)
> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17)
> -#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1)
> -#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2)
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
> +#define PME_TURN_OFF HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(4))
> +#define PME_TO_ACK HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(9))
> +
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180
> +#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
> +
> #define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300
> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
> +#define PCIE_LINKUP_MASK GENMASK(17, 16)
Here you are adding a macro (PCIE_LINKUP_MASK) that is not used.
I suggest that you move the addition to the patch where it is actually used.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 11:28 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Remove unused PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_DEBUG Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:35 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:47 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-04-22 11:51 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 12:30 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 12:39 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 16:03 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Unify link status checks with FIELD_GET Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 11:50 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 12:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-22 12:29 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-22 11:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAeB7fO_LCzi-xCh@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox