From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
lukas@wunner.de, aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Avoid suspending the device with errors
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 08:12:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAnILntDM4xwaoPX@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422194537.GA380850@bhelgaas>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 02:45:37PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:23:41PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > If an error is triggered before or during system suspend, any bus level
> > power state transition will result in unpredictable behaviour by the
> > device with failed recovery. Avoid suspending such a device and leave
> > it in its existing power state.
> >
> > This only covers the devices that rely on PCI core PM for their power
> > state transition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: Synchronize AER handling with PCI PM (Rafael)
> >
> > More discussion on [1].
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0g-aJXfVH+Uc=9eRPuW08t-6PwzdyMXsC6FZRKYJtY03Q@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Thanks for the pointer, but the commit log for this patch needs to be
> complete in itself. "Unpredictable behavior" is kind of hand-wavy and
> doesn't really help understand the problem.
>
> > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 3 ++-
> > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > include/linux/aer.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > index f57ea36d125d..289a1fa7cb2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
> > + /* Avoid suspending the device with errors */
> > + if (!pci_aer_in_progress(pci_dev) && !pci_dev->state_saved) {
>
> This looks potentially racy, since hardware can set bits in
> PCI_EXP_DEVSTA at any time.
Which is why it's placed in ->suspend_noirq() callback. Can it still race?
Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 13:53 [PATCH v2] PCI/PM: Avoid suspending the device with errors Raag Jadav
2025-04-22 18:01 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-22 19:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-24 5:12 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-04-24 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-26 19:24 ` Raag Jadav
2025-04-22 23:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-23 12:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-24 5:38 ` Raag Jadav
2025-04-24 11:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-26 20:18 ` Raag Jadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAnILntDM4xwaoPX@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox