Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] blk: honor isolcpus configuration

Ming Lei
2025-05-06T03:18:22Z

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> I've added back the isolcpus io_queue agrument. This avoids any semantic
> changes of managed_irq.

IMO, this is correct thing to do.

> I don't like it but I haven't found a
> better way to deal with it. Ming clearly stated managed_irq should not
> change.

Precisely, we can't cause io hang and break existing managed_irq applications,
especially you know there isn't kernel solution for it, same for v5, v6 or
whatever.

I will look at v6 this week.

Thanks,
Ming