From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] topology: make for_each_node_with_cpus() O(N)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 19:04:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aB41j_3g4KHnoXaz@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509162009.540506-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Hi Yury,
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 12:20:08PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>
> for_each_node_with_cpus() calls nr_cpus_node() at every iteration, which
> makes it O(N^2). Kernel tracks such nodes with N_CPU record in node_states
> array. Switching to it makes for_each_node_with_cpus() O(N).
Makes sense to me.
Maybe we should mention that previously we were only considering online
nodes with CPUs assigned. Now, we can include also offline nodes with CPUs
assigned (assuming it's possible)?
Semantically speaking, since the name doesn't include "online", it seems
more logical to ignore the state of the node. And if checking the online
state is required, the user can just use node_online() within the loop.
Thanks,
-Andrea
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/nodemask.h | 1 +
> include/linux/topology.h | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> index f0ac0633366b..1e2bdda1a0a5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> @@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static __always_inline int node_random(const nodemask_t *maskp)
>
> #define for_each_node(node) for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
> #define for_each_online_node(node) for_each_node_state(node, N_ONLINE)
> +#define for_each_node_with_cpus(node) for_each_node_state(node, N_CPU)
>
> /*
> * For nodemask scratch area.
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 24e715f0f6d2..ffee6b4a071a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/mmzone.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> @@ -39,10 +40,6 @@
> #define nr_cpus_node(node) cpumask_weight(cpumask_of_node(node))
> #endif
>
> -#define for_each_node_with_cpus(node) \
> - for_each_online_node(node) \
> - if (nr_cpus_node(node))
> -
> int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
>
> /* Conform to ACPI 2.0 SLIT distance definitions */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 16:20 [PATCH] topology: make for_each_node_with_cpus() O(N) Yury Norov
2025-05-09 17:04 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-05-13 15:38 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aB41j_3g4KHnoXaz@gpd3 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox