From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71797405A; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745927346; cv=none; b=Ji+Fq0KcngP0zCu0gvy/tFd39mMELegs3mUnbcOG9jb1Q6fjlAqQAz2UqdbDvr4okdJkkTpEWe3WARTV9kDWd6FdEVN1+32lsoIPM9dh0SLDYXFO0dvAMuetdq60Tr3potAWQlhZyu4RHRRFB8ROqWFNEPLne5Tr7HeZhFrPJXk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745927346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LNxe9L/dVH+WsWoZiDeGo991fLnDBQKuOgP13ml2SeI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JAMt6VjdhNUFdwY8kNKzhcr1F12klT59g39HMHcGJ6xsVuonj+cljOiS1FOX60lJwWsRkCT2rrF1RGxoC58lk686FHDyArc6bDA2ZLYypbQAD9SowNsD/CVNJt7PPC2oJauJWecUgbApVN/rcKaEad60aHeVAZydeMgo13mmGSs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=kZN9ESih; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="kZN9ESih" Received: from gaggiata.pivistrello.it (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 070E81F945; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:49:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1745927343; bh=oDwIkddYcjzqpY0qn+RN60cxRzSZFEEPA0b1jtHao/Y=; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=kZN9ESihpGKMvPY4cStlEn6RlCOnHRvDpolr94jqob8QWMXuZSmIGMA/LL2RgepaF enHO+t6u/Ug1npMjfqK4EfrjvnMgezzOJ3Jo8m2UxqJUjiJ9n/1of4majt2inv70wb bCcNx/65qczywfHfoXMUXd/8fWtBDSqnbZYHUlQ3ct85QGyW8JtoamDHRg0ryC8cX8 7djC+wHLUcFTMTd5gfWaTt5aKa4j7lF5d5zJBs1GhxFm4frAhxQKakwhnMjLEtPoAe Dl5lhkIU4s/GInKY8O7f2co6OAwK2PAMBnbGeFe8FR06mn3vQKtxo1j9rs/cH5vxLn H3slz76KCoPOw== Received: by gaggiata.pivistrello.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A8997F9D9; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:49:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:49:02 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Lucas Stach , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Francesco Dolcini , imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@ew.tq-group.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] arm64: dts: imx: Move Ethernet aliases out of SoC DTSI Message-ID: References: <20250425-dts-imx-aliases-ethernet-v1-0-15b9d5cca611@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:39:20AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 25.04.2025 um 21:48 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > > Ethernet interface, like other exposed interfaces, aliases depend on > > actual board configuration, e.g. its labeling, thus aliases should be > > defined per each board or each SoM. > > > Breaking existing users for the sake of aligning the i.MX platform with more > idiomatic DT usage does not seem to be a worthwhile trade-off to me. FWIW, I agree with Lucas. Francesco