public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Alexander Usyskin" <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops/32: Convert variable_ffs() and fls() zero-case handling to C
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:08:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBClAy837xcLnVpp@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh5DUS+nhfTxPEEbaB9dsFib39gWatrX4NoFq_MpdOzGw@mail.gmail.com>


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 00:14, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > And, just out of intellectual curiosity, I also tried to measure the
> > code generation price of the +1 standards-quirk in the fls()/ffs()
> > interface as well:
> >
> > ... and unless I messed up the patch, it seems to have a surprisingly
> > low impact - maybe because the compiler can amortize its cost by
> > adjusting all dependent code mostly at build time, so the +1 doesn't
> > end up being generated most of the time?
> 
> No, I think one issue is that most users actually end up subtracting
> one from the return value of 'ffs()', because the "bit #0 returns 1"
> semantics of the standard ffs() function really is insane.
> 
> It's not just that it doesn't match sane hardware, it's also that it
> doesn't match sane *users*. If bit #0 is set, people want '0', so they
> typically subtract 1.
> 
> So when you stop adding one, you aren't actually removing code -
> you're often adding it.
> 
> Just see how many hits you get from
> 
>     git grep '\<ffs(.*).*-.*1'
> 
> which is obviously not a very precise pattern, but just look at the
> output and see just *how* common that "subtract one" thing is.
> 
> I really don't understand how anybody *ever* thought that the whole
> "return one bigger" was a good idea for ffs().

Yeah. No argument from me that it's a badly thought out interface - I 
was just surprised that it doesn't seem to impact performance as badly 
as I expected. I have to add that a lot of work went into absorbing the 
negative effects of the ffs()/fls() interfaces:

  starship:~/tip> git grep -Ee '__ffs\(|__fls\(' | wc -l
  1055

So it impacts code quality negatively, which is arguably the worse side 
effect.

> But maybe people really were poisoned by the Pascal mindset. Or maybe 
> it was invented by some ancient Roman who hadn't heard of the concept 
> of zero. Who knows?

Hey, ancient Romans didn't even have the concept of *whitespaces* and 
punctuation to begin with:

    https://historyofinformation.com/images/Vergilius_Augusteus,_Georgica_121.jpg

Lazy stonemasons the lot of them.

Romans were the worst ever coders too I suspect. What have the Romans 
ever done for us??

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-25 14:15 [PATCH] [RFC] x86/cpu: rework instruction set selection Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-25 15:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-25 16:13   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-25 20:15     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-26  9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-26 13:17   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-26 18:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27  0:35       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-26 18:58   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-26 19:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27 13:24       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-27 21:17         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-26 19:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-26 19:55       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-26 23:47         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-27 10:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27  0:02         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-27 19:17         ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-27 19:34           ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-27 21:14             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-28  6:58             ` [PATCH] bitops/32: Convert variable_ffs() and fls() zero-case handling to C Ingo Molnar
2025-04-28  7:05               ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-28  7:14                 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-28 12:30                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-28 13:41                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-28 16:23                   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29 10:08                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-29 14:32                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-28 16:14                 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-28 21:38                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-29  0:12                     ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29  2:00                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-29  2:22                         ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29  2:25                         ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29  3:13                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-29 14:38                             ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29 18:05                               ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29 19:13                                 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29 20:12                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29 21:23                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-29 21:53                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29 21:59                                         ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29 22:04                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-29 22:10                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-29 22:22                                             ` Andrew Cooper
2025-04-29 22:34                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-27  9:50       ` [PATCH] [RFC] x86/cpu: rework instruction set selection Ingo Molnar
2025-04-30 21:54       ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBClAy837xcLnVpp@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox