From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/17] unwind_user/deferred: Add unwind cache
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 11:37:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBc1cqWcTJmeqg3X@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250502165008.734340489@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> -struct unwind_task_info {
> +struct unwind_cache {
> unsigned long *entries;
> + unsigned int nr_entries;
> +};
> +
> +struct unwind_task_info {
> + struct unwind_cache cache;
> };
> @@ -19,17 +20,29 @@ int unwind_deferred_trace(struct unwind_stacktrace *trace)
> if (current->flags & PF_EXITING)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!info->entries) {
> - info->entries = kmalloc_array(UNWIND_MAX_ENTRIES, sizeof(long),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!info->entries)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!cache->entries) {
> + cache->entries = kmalloc_array(UNWIND_MAX_ENTRIES, sizeof(long),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cache->entries)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
That's just sloppy: why isn't the unwind_cache a pointer to begin with,
with the dynamically allocated object containing ::nr_entries?
Also, the code has whitespace damage.
> +
> + trace->entries = cache->entries;
> +
> + if (cache->nr_entries) {
> + /*
> + * The user stack has already been previously unwound in this
> + * entry context. Skip the unwind and use the cache.
> + */
> + trace->nr = cache->nr_entries;
> + return 0;
Whitespace damage here too. Maybe in other patches as well.
Please don't rush this series without first reviewing it carefully ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-04 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 16:47 [PATCH v7 00/17] unwind_user: perf: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] unwind_user: Add user space unwinding API Steven Rostedt
2025-05-04 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04 16:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-04 17:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] unwind_user/x86: Enable frame pointer unwinding on x86 Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] perf/x86: Rename and move get_segment_base() and make it global Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] unwind_user: Add compat mode frame pointer support Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] unwind_user/x86: Enable compat mode frame pointer unwinding on x86 Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] unwind_user/deferred: Add unwind_deferred_trace() Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] unwind_user/deferred: Add unwind cache Steven Rostedt
2025-05-04 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-05-04 16:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] unwind_user/deferred: Add deferred unwinding interface Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] unwind deferred: Use bitmask to determine which callbacks to call Steven Rostedt
2025-05-09 1:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] unwind deferred: Use SRCU unwind_deferred_task_work() Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() init_nr argument Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] perf: Have get_perf_callchain() return NULL if crosstask and user are set Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD instead of current->mm == NULL Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] perf: Simplify get_perf_callchain() user logic Steven Rostedt
2025-05-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] perf: Skip user unwind if the task is a kernel thread Steven Rostedt
2025-05-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] unwind_user: perf: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBc1cqWcTJmeqg3X@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox