From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 03/23] x86/boot: Drop global variables keeping track of LA57 state
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 15:50:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBdwwR52hI37bW9a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250504095230.2932860-28-ardb+git@google.com>
* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com> wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> On x86_64, the core kernel is entered in long mode, which implies that
> paging is enabled. This means that the CR4.LA57 control bit is
> guaranteed to be in sync with the number of paging levels used by the
> kernel, and there is no need to store this in a variable.
>
> There is also no need to use variables for storing the calculations of
> pgdir_shift and ptrs_per_p4d, as they are easily determined on the fly.
>
> This removes the need for two different sources of truth (i.e., early
> and late) for determining whether 5-level paging is in use: CR4.LA57
> always reflects the actual state, and never changes from the point of
> view of the 64-bit core kernel. It also removes the need for exposing
> the associated variables to the startup code. The only potential concern
> is the cost of CR4 accesses, which can be mitigated using alternatives
> patching based on feature detection.
>
> Note that even the decompressor does not manipulate any page tables
> before updating CR4.LA57, so it can also avoid the associated global
> variables entirely. However, as it does not implement alternatives
> patching, the associated ELF sections need to be discarded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 4 --
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/pgtable_64.c | 12 ------
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 +
> arch/x86/boot/startup/map_kernel.c | 12 +-----
> arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 9 ----
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h | 43 ++++++++++----------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 11 -----
> arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 3 --
> 9 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
So this patch breaks the build & creates header dependency hell on
x86-64 allnoconfig:
starship:~/tip> m kernel/pid.o
DESCEND objtool
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h:5,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h:283,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:21,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:59,
from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:60,
from ./include/linux/swait.h:7,
from ./include/linux/completion.h:12,
from ./include/linux/crypto.h:15,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
./arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h:29:34: warning: "pgtable_l5_enabled" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
29 | # define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 46)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/page-flags-layout.h:31:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS’
31 | #define SECTIONS_SHIFT (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - SECTION_SIZE_BITS)
Plus I'm not sure I'm happy about this kind of complexity getting
embedded deep within low level MM primitives:
static __always_inline __pure bool pgtable_l5_enabled(void)
{
unsigned long r;
bool ret;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL))
return false;
asm(ALTERNATIVE_TERNARY(
"movq %%cr4, %[reg] \n\t btl %[la57], %k[reg]" CC_SET(c),
%P[feat], "stc", "clc")
: [reg] "=&r" (r), CC_OUT(c) (ret)
: [feat] "i" (X86_FEATURE_LA57),
[la57] "i" (X86_CR4_LA57_BIT)
: "cc");
return ret;
}
it's basically everywhere:
arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h:#define __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 56 : 47)
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h: if (pgtable_l5_enabled()) \
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h: if (pgtable_l5_enabled()) \
arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h: if (pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define pgd_clear(pgd) (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? native_pgd_clear(pgd) : 0)
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h: if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32_types.h:#define pgtable_l5_enabled() 0
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h: return !pgtable_l5_enabled();
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h: if (pgtable_l5_enabled() ||
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h:static __always_inline __pure bool pgtable_l5_enabled(void)
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h:#define PGDIR_SHIFT (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 48 : 39)
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h:#define PTRS_PER_P4D (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 512 : 1)
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h:# define VMALLOC_SIZE_TB (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? VMALLOC_SIZE_TB_L5 : VMALLOC_SIZE_TB_L4)
arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h:# define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 46)
Inlined approximately a gazillion times. (449 times on x86 defconfig.
Yes, I just counted it.)
And it's not even worth it, as it generates horrendous code:
154: 0f 20 e0 mov %cr4,%rax
157: 0f ba e0 0c bt $0xc,%eax
... while CR4 access might be faster these days, it's certainly not as
fast as simple percpu access. Plus it clobbers a register (RAX in the
example above), which is unnecessary for a flag test.
Cannot pgtable_l5_enabled() be a single, simple percpu flag or so?
And yes, this creates another layer for these values - but thus
decouples low level MM from detection & implementation complexities,
which is a plus ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-04 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-04 9:52 [RFT PATCH v2 00/23] x86: strict separation of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 01/23] x86/boot: Move early_setup_gdt() back into head64.c Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 02/23] x86/boot: Disregard __supported_pte_mask in __startup_64() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 03/23] x86/boot: Drop global variables keeping track of LA57 state Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-05-04 14:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-04 19:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05 22:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-05 21:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 04/23] x86/sev: Make sev_snp_enabled() a static function Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 05/23] x86/sev: Move instruction decoder into separate source file Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 14:48 ` [RFT PATCH v2 05/23] " Tom Lendacky
2025-05-05 14:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-07 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-07 11:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-08 11:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 06/23] x86/sev: Disentangle #VC handling code from startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 5:31 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 14:58 ` [RFT PATCH v2 06/23] " Tom Lendacky
2025-05-05 16:54 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 07/23] x86/sev: Separate MSR and GHCB based snp_cpuid() via a callback Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 08/23] x86/sev: Fall back to early page state change code only during boot Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 09/23] x86/sev: Move GHCB page based HV communication out of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 10/23] x86/sev: Use boot SVSM CA for all startup and init code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 11/23] x86/boot: Drop redundant RMPADJUST in SEV SVSM presence check Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 12/23] x86/sev: Unify SEV-SNP hypervisor feature check Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 13/23] x86/linkage: Add SYM_PIC_ALIAS() macro helper to emit symbol aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 14/23] x86/boot: Add a bunch of PIC aliases Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 15/23] x86/boot: Provide __pti_set_user_pgtbl() to startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:20 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-05 16:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-06 7:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-05 16:54 ` tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 16/23] x86/sev: Provide PIC aliases for SEV related data objects Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 17/23] x86/sev: Move __sev_[get|put]_ghcb() into separate noinstr object Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 18/23] x86/sev: Export startup routines for ordinary use Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 19/23] x86/boot: Created a confined code area for startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 20/23] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 21/23] x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 22/23] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 9:52 ` [RFT PATCH v2 23/23] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-04 14:04 ` [RFT PATCH v2 00/23] x86: strict separation of startup code Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04 14:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 5:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 9:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-07 12:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-08 10:55 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBdwwR52hI37bW9a@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
--cc=kevinloughlin@google.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox