From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
will@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, morbo@google.com,
justinstitt@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com,
hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 11:36:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBnmSTsuZKoxxtm8@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cfcd0c5-79a2-45de-8497-fb95ef834dc1@arm.com>
Hi Ryan,
> On 06/05/2025 11:17, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 10:16, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
> >>> On 06/05/2025 09:09, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:23:27PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 11:16:12AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 02 May 2025 19:04:12 +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> >>>>>>>>> which is done in early_map_kernel().
> >>>>>>>>> Therefore, data/test_prot could be set incorrectly by PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> PTE_MAYBE_NG macro set NG bit according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> >>>>>>>>> and this variable places in .bss section.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), with some slight tweaking of the
> >>>>>>>> comment, thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1/1] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
> >>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/12657bcd1835
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm going to drop this for now. The kernel compiled with a clang 19.1.5
> >>>>>>> version I have around (Debian sid) fails to boot, gets stuck early on:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> $ clang --version
> >>>>>>> Debian clang version 19.1.5 (1)
> >>>>>>> Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>>>>>> Thread model: posix
> >>>>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-19/bin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I didn't have time to investigate, disassemble etc. I'll have a look
> >>>>>>> next week.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just for your information.
> >>>>>> When I see the debian package, clang 19.1.5-1 doesn't supply anymore:
> >>>>>> - https://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-19/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and the default version for sid is below:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $ clang-19 --version
> >>>>>> Debian clang version 19.1.7 (3)
> >>>>>> Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>>>>> Thread model: posix
> >>>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-19/bin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When I tested with above version with arm64-linux's for-next/fixes
> >>>>>> including this patch. it works well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It doesn't seem to be toolchain related. It fails with gcc as well from
> >>>>> Debian stable but you'd need some older CPU (even if emulated, e.g.
> >>>>> qemu). It fails with Cortex-A72 (guest on Raspberry Pi 4) but not
> >>>>> Neoverse-N2. Also changing the annotation from __ro_after_init to
> >>>>> __read_mostly also works.
> >>>
> >>> I think this is likely because __ro_after_init is also "ro before init" - i.e.
> >>> if you try to write to it in the PI code an exception is generated due to it
> >>> being mapped RO. Looks like early_map_kernel() is writiing to it.
> >>
> >> Indeed.
> >>
> >>> I've noticed a similar problem in the past and it would be nice to fix it so
> >>> that PI code maps __ro_after_init RW.
> >>
> >> The issue is that the store occurs via the ID map, which only consists
> >> of one R-X and one RW- section. I'm not convinced that it's worth the
> >> hassle to relax this.
> >>
> >> If moving the variable to .data works, then let's just do that.
> >
> > Good to know there's no other more serious issue. I'll move this
> > variable to __read_mostly.
> >
> > It seems to fail in early_map_kernel() if RANDOMIZE_BASE is enabled.
>
> Ahh that explains why Yeoreum Yun can't see the issue:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {
> u64 kaslr_seed = kaslr_early_init(fdt, chosen);
>
> if (kaslr_seed && kaslr_requires_kpti())
> arm64_use_ng_mappings = true;
>
> kaslr_offset |= kaslr_seed & ~(MIN_KIMG_ALIGN - 1);
> }
Thanks to clarify me to know.
I've misread the address of arm64_use_ng_mapping :( so my brain works wrong.
Thanks again!
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 18:04 [PATCH v2] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-03 10:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 14:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 20:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-05 19:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 8:09 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 8:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 8:53 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:38 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 9:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-06 10:08 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 10:47 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:57 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-06 10:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:22 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-06 10:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:36 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-05-06 9:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-06 10:49 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBnmSTsuZKoxxtm8@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox