public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count
@ 2025-05-07  0:32 Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  2025-05-07  2:21 ` Feng, Kenneth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2025-05-07  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alexander.deucher, kenneth.feng, christian.koenig; +Cc: amd-gfx, linux-kernel

Hi,
  I noticed two functions that are unused but I wasn't sure what to
do with them:

smu_v13_0_init_display_count() isn't called/wired up, where as the
v11 version is wired up:

 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
     3574:	.init_display_count = smu_v11_0_init_display_count,

so is v13 really unused or should it be wired up in a similar way?

secondly, smu_mode2_reset_is_support() is uncalled, but it's
the only caller through the mode2_reset_is_support() function
pointer; so if smu_mode2_reset_is_support() was deleted, does
it then make sense to clean up all of
  sienna_cichlid_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  aldebaran_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  smu_v13_0_6_is_mode2_reset_supported

which that function pointer is sett to.

Thanks in advance,

Dave

-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count
  2025-05-07  0:32 questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count Dr. David Alan Gilbert
@ 2025-05-07  2:21 ` Feng, Kenneth
  2025-05-07 17:22   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Feng, Kenneth @ 2025-05-07  2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, Deucher, Alexander, Koenig, Christian
  Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

Hello Dave,
smu_v13_0_init_display_count() is obsolete on smu13 series. It will be removed.
Secondly, with cod evolving, all of below can be removed as well.
  sienna_cichlid_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  aldebaran_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  smu_v13_0_6_is_mode2_reset_supported
Thanks.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 8:32 AM
To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Feng, Kenneth <Kenneth.Feng@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count

Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.


Hi,
  I noticed two functions that are unused but I wasn't sure what to do with them:

smu_v13_0_init_display_count() isn't called/wired up, where as the
v11 version is wired up:

 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
     3574:      .init_display_count = smu_v11_0_init_display_count,

so is v13 really unused or should it be wired up in a similar way?

secondly, smu_mode2_reset_is_support() is uncalled, but it's the only caller through the mode2_reset_is_support() function pointer; so if smu_mode2_reset_is_support() was deleted, does it then make sense to clean up all of
  sienna_cichlid_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  aldebaran_is_mode2_reset_supported,
  smu_v13_0_6_is_mode2_reset_supported

which that function pointer is sett to.

Thanks in advance,

Dave

--
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count
  2025-05-07  2:21 ` Feng, Kenneth
@ 2025-05-07 17:22   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2025-05-07 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Feng, Kenneth
  Cc: Deucher, Alexander, Koenig, Christian,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Feng, Kenneth (Kenneth.Feng@amd.com) wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
> 
> Hello Dave,

Hi Kenneth,
  Thanks for the reply.

> smu_v13_0_init_display_count() is obsolete on smu13 series. It will be removed.
> Secondly, with cod evolving, all of below can be removed as well.
>   sienna_cichlid_is_mode2_reset_supported,
>   aldebaran_is_mode2_reset_supported,
>   smu_v13_0_6_is_mode2_reset_supported

Great, I've sent a series to delete all those, see 20250507170145.102508-1-linux@treblig.org

Dave

> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 8:32 AM
> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Feng, Kenneth <Kenneth.Feng@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count
> 
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> 
> 
> Hi,
>   I noticed two functions that are unused but I wasn't sure what to do with them:
> 
> smu_v13_0_init_display_count() isn't called/wired up, where as the
> v11 version is wired up:
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/navi10_ppt.c
>      3574:      .init_display_count = smu_v11_0_init_display_count,
> 
> so is v13 really unused or should it be wired up in a similar way?
> 
> secondly, smu_mode2_reset_is_support() is uncalled, but it's the only caller through the mode2_reset_is_support() function pointer; so if smu_mode2_reset_is_support() was deleted, does it then make sense to clean up all of
>   sienna_cichlid_is_mode2_reset_supported,
>   aldebaran_is_mode2_reset_supported,
>   smu_v13_0_6_is_mode2_reset_supported
> 
> which that function pointer is sett to.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Dave
> 
> --
>  -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
> / Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \
> \        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
>  \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-07 17:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-07  0:32 questions about smu_mode2_reset_is_support and smu_v13_0_init_display_count Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-05-07  2:21 ` Feng, Kenneth
2025-05-07 17:22   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox