Re: [PATCH net-next V2 06/11] net/mlx5e: SHAMPO: Separate pool for headers

[Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>]

On 22 May 16:24, Mina Almasry wrote:
>On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:09 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 22 May 15:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> >On Fri, 23 May 2025 00:41:21 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> >> Allocate a separate page pool for headers when SHAMPO is enabled.
>> >> This will be useful for adding support to zc page pool, which has to be
>> >> different from the headers page pool.
>> >
>> >Could you explain why always allocate a separate pool?
>>
>> Better flow management, 0 conditional code on data path to alloc/return
>> header buffers, since in mlx5 we already have separate paths to handle
>> header, we don't have/need bnxt_separate_head_pool() and
>> rxr->need_head_pool spread across the code..
>>
>> Since we alloc and return pages in bulks, it makes more sense to manage
>> headers and data in separate pools if we are going to do it anyway for
>> "undreadable_pools", and when there's no performance impact.
>>
>
>Are you allocating full pages for each incoming header (which is much
>smaller than a page)? Or are you reusing the same PAGE_SIZE from the
>page_pool to store multiple headers?
>

Multiple headers MLX5E_SHAMPO_WQ_HEADER_PER_PAGE;

>-- 
>Thanks,
>Mina