Re: [PATCH v3 18/23] ACPI: RISC-V: Add support to update gsi range

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 07:09:34PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> 
> Some RISC-V interrupt controllers like RPMI based system MSI interrupt
> controllers do not have MADT entry defined. These interrupt controllers
> exist only in the namespace. ACPI spec defines _GSB method to get the
> GSI base of the interrupt controller, However, there is no such standard
> method to get the GSI range. To support such interrupt controllers, set
> the GSI range of such interrupt controllers to non-overlapping range and
> provide API for interrupt controller driver to update it with proper
> value.

...

> +static inline int riscv_acpi_update_gsi_range(u32 gsi_base, u32 nr_irqs)
> +{
> +	return -1;

Why not using the defined error code?

> +}

...

> +int riscv_acpi_update_gsi_range(u32 gsi_base, u32 nr_irqs)
> +{
> +	struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(ext_intc_element, &ext_intc_list, list) {
> +		if (gsi_base == ext_intc_element->gsi_base &&
> +		    (ext_intc_element->flag & RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING)) {
> +			ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
> +			ext_intc_element->flag &= ~RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}

> +	return -1;

Ditto.

> +}

...

> +	/* If nr_irqs is zero, indicate it in flag and set to max range possible */
> +	if (!nr_irqs) {

Make conditional positive.

> +		ext_intc_element->flag |= RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING;
> +		ext_intc_element->nr_irqs =  U32_MAX - ext_intc_element->gsi_base;

One space too many.

> +	} else {
> +		ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
> +	}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko