The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org,
	james.clark@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] coresight: holding cscfg_csdev_lock while removing cscfg from csdev
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 12:13:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCR63YGVjWe+L3mR@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514091509.GD26114@e132581.arm.com>

Hi Leo,

> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 06:06:21PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > There'll be possible race scenario for coresight config:
> >
> > CPU0                                          CPU1
> > (perf enable)                                 load module
> >                                               cscfg_load_config_sets()
> >                                               activate config. // sysfs
> >                                               (sys_active_cnt == 1)
> > ...
> > cscfg_csdev_enable_active_config()
> >   lock(csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock)
> >                                               deactivate config // sysfs
> >                                               (sys_activec_cnt == 0)
> >                                               cscfg_unload_config_sets()
> >   <iterating config_csdev_list>               cscfg_remove_owned_csdev_configs()
> >   // here load config activate by CPU1
> >   unlock(csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock)
> >
> > iterating config_csdev_list could be raced with config_csdev_list's
> > entry delete.
> >
> > To resolve this race , hold csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock() while
> > cscfg_remove_owned_csdev_configs()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> > Fixes: 02bd588e12df ("coresight: configuration: Update API to permit dynamic load/unload")
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > index a70c1454b410..5d194b9269f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > @@ -391,14 +391,17 @@ static void cscfg_owner_put(struct cscfg_load_owner_info *owner_info)
> >  static void cscfg_remove_owned_csdev_configs(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *load_owner)
> >  {
> >  	struct cscfg_config_csdev *config_csdev, *tmp;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> >
> >  	if (list_empty(&csdev->config_csdev_list))
> >  		return;
> >
> > +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock, flags);
>
> Could we use the format:
>
>    guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock);

No problem. I'll convert with guard.

> Sorry I did not mention this in the earlier review.  Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>

Thanks :)
>
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(config_csdev, tmp, &csdev->config_csdev_list, node) {
> >  		if (config_csdev->config_desc->load_owner == load_owner)
> >  			list_del(&config_csdev->node);
> >  	}
> > +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&csdev->cscfg_csdev_lock, flags);
>
>
> >  }
> >
> >  static void cscfg_remove_owned_csdev_features(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *load_owner)
> > --
> > LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
> >

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 17:06 [PATCH v5] coresight: prevent deactivate active config while enabling the config Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-13 17:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] coresight/etm4: fix missing disable active config Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-13 17:06   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] coresight: holding cscfg_csdev_lock while removing cscfg from csdev Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-13 17:06     ` [PATCH v5 3/3] coresight: prevent deactivate active config while enabling the config Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-14  9:30       ` Leo Yan
2025-05-14  9:39         ` Leo Yan
2025-05-14 11:14           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-14 11:04         ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-14 12:47           ` Leo Yan
2025-05-14  9:15     ` [PATCH v5 2/3] coresight: holding cscfg_csdev_lock while removing cscfg from csdev Leo Yan
2025-05-14 11:13       ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-05-14  9:05   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] coresight/etm4: fix missing disable active config Leo Yan
2025-05-14 11:16     ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCR63YGVjWe+L3mR@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox