From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Amit Shah <Amit.Shah@amd.com>
Cc: "jon@nutanix.com" <jon@nutanix.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/18] KVM: VMX: Wire up Intel MBEC enable/disable logic
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 05:55:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCSSptnxW7EBEzSQ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dd4eee79fec75a47493251b87c74595826f97bc.camel@amd.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2025, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-13 at 06:28 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025, Jon Kohler wrote:
> > > > On May 12, 2025, at 2:23 PM, Sean Christopherson
> > > > This is wrong and unnecessary. As mentioned early, the input that
> > > > matters is vmcs12. This flag should *never* be set for vmcs01.
> > >
> > > I’ll page this back in, but I’m like 75% sure it didn’t work when I
> > > did it that way.
> >
> > Then you had other bugs. The control is per-VMCS and thus needs to
> > be emulated
> > as such. Definitely holler if you get stuck, there's no need to
> > develop this in
> > complete isolation.
>
> Looking at this from the AMD GMET POV, here's how I think support for
> this feature for a Windows guest would be implemented:
>
> * Do not enable the GMET feature in vmcb01. Only the Windows guest (L1
> guest) sets this bit for its own guest (L2 guest). KVM (L0) should see
> the bit set in vmcb02 (and vmcb12). OTOH, pass on the CPUID bit to the
> L1 guest.
>
> * KVM needs to propagate the #NPF to Windows (instead of handling
> anything itself -- ie no shadow page table adjustments or walks
> needed). Windows spawns an L2 guest that causes the #NPF, and Windows
> is the one that needs to consume that fault.
>
> * KVM needs to differentiate an #NPF exit due to GMET or non-GMET
> condition -- check the CPL and U/S bits from the exit, and the NX bit
> from the PTE that faulted. If due to GMET, propagate it to the guest.
> If not, continue handling it
Yes, but no. KVM shouldn't need to do anything special here other than teaching
update_permission_bitmask() to understand the GMET fault case. Ditto for MBEC.
I'd type something up, but I would quickly encounter -ENOCOFFE :-)
With the correct mmu->permissions[], permission_fault() will naturally detect
that a #NPF (or EPT Violation) from L2 due to a GMET/MBEC violation is a fault
in the nNPT/nEPT domain and route the exit to L1.
> (btw KVM MMU API question -- from the #NPF, I have the GPA of the L2
> guest. How to go from that guest GPA to look up the NX bit for that
> page? I skimmed and there doesn't seem to be an existing API for it -
> so is walking the tables the only solution?)
As above, KVM doesn't manually look up individual bits while handling faults.
The walk of the guest page tables (L1's NPT/EPT for this scenario) performed by
FNAME(walk_addr_generic) will gather the effective permissions in walker->pte_access,
and check for a permission_fault() after the walk is completed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 20:36 [RFC PATCH 00/18] KVM: VMX: Introduce Intel Mode-Based Execute Control (MBEC) Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 01/18] KVM: VMX: Remove EPT_VIOLATIONS_ACC_*_BIT defines Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 02/18] KVM: nVMX: Decouple EPT RWX bits from EPT Violation protection bits Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 03/18] KVM: x86: Add module parameter for Intel MBEC Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 18:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:18 ` Jon Kohler
2025-05-13 7:57 ` Shah, Amit
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 04/18] KVM: VMX: add cpu_has_vmx_mbec helper Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:17 ` Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/18] KVM: x86: Add pt_guest_exec_control to kvm_vcpu_arch Jon Kohler
2025-04-22 6:27 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-12 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/18] KVM: VMX: Wire up Intel MBEC enable/disable logic Jon Kohler
2025-04-22 7:06 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-12 18:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:16 ` Jon Kohler
2025-05-13 13:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-14 11:14 ` Shah, Amit
2025-05-14 12:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-16 9:27 ` Shah, Amit
2025-06-17 14:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-09 13:40 ` Shah, Amit
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/18] KVM: VMX: Define VMX_EPT_USER_EXECUTABLE_MASK Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove SPTE_PERM_MASK Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend access bitfield in kvm_mmu_page_role Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 18:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:14 ` Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/18] KVM: VMX: Extend EPT Violation protection bits Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 18:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 11/18] KVM: VMX: Enhance EPT violation handler for PROT_USER_EXEC Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 12/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce shadow_ux_mask Jon Kohler
2025-04-23 3:06 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-12 19:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 13/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Adjust SPTE_MMIO_ALLOWED_MASK to understand MBEC Jon Kohler
2025-04-23 5:37 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-12 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:11 ` Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 14/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend is_executable_pte " Jon Kohler
2025-04-23 6:16 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-12 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:09 ` Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 15/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_spte " Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 21:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:04 ` Jon Kohler
2025-05-13 17:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 16/18] KVM: nVMX: Setup Intel MBEC in nested secondary controls Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 21:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 17/18] KVM: VMX: Allow MBEC with EVMCS Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 21:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 2:01 ` Jon Kohler
2025-03-13 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 18/18] KVM: x86: Enable module parameter for MBEC Jon Kohler
2025-04-15 9:29 ` [RFC PATCH 00/18] KVM: VMX: Introduce Intel Mode-Based Execute Control (MBEC) Mickaël Salaün
2025-04-15 14:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-12 15:26 ` Jon Kohler
2025-04-15 14:43 ` Jon Kohler
2025-04-16 15:44 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-04-23 13:54 ` Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
2025-05-12 15:26 ` Jon Kohler
2025-05-12 21:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-13 1:59 ` Jon Kohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCSSptnxW7EBEzSQ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=Amit.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).