From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/29] x86/boot/e820: Print out sizes of E820 memory ranges
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 12:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCXFdvWiNW94F24R@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAc5Wlwj4gaBApIy@surfacebook.localdomain>
* Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:51:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar kirjoitti:
> > Before:
> >
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009fbff] usable
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009fc00-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000007ffdbfff] usable
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000007ffdc000-0x000000007fffffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000b0000000-0x00000000bfffffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed1ffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000feffc000-0x00000000feffffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000fd00000000-0x000000ffffffffff] reserved
> >
> > After:
> >
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009fbff] 639 KB kernel usable RAM
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009fc00-0x000000000009ffff] 1 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x00000000000a0000-0x00000000000effff] 320 KB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff] 64 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000007ffdbfff] 1.9 GB kernel usable RAM
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000007ffdc000-0x000000007fffffff] 144 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000afffffff] 768 MB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000b0000000-0x00000000bfffffff] 256 MB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x00000000c0000000-0x00000000fed1bfff] 1005.1 MB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed1ffff] 16 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x00000000fed20000-0x00000000feffbfff] 2.8 MB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000feffc000-0x00000000feffffff] 16 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x00000000ff000000-0x00000000fffbffff] 15.7 MB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] 256 KB reserved
> > BIOS-e820: [gap 0x0000000100000000-0x000000fcffffffff] 1008 GB ...
> > BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000fd00000000-0x000000ffffffffff] 12 GB reserved
> >
> > Note how a 1-digit precision field is printed out if a range is
> > fractional in its largest-enclosing natural size unit.
> >
> > So the "256 MB" and "12 GB" fields above denote exactly 256 MB and
> > 12 GB regions, while "1.9 GB" signals the region's fractional nature
> > and it being just below 2GB.
> >
> > Printing E820 maps with such details visualizes 'weird' ranges
> > at a glance, and gives users a better understanding of how
> > large the various ranges are, without having to perform hexadecimal
> > subtraction in their minds.
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
> > + * Print out the size of a E820 region, in human-readable
> > + * fashion, going from KB, MB, GB to TB units.
> > + *
> > + * Print out fractional sizes with a single digit of precision.
> > + */
> > +static void e820_print_size(u64 size)
> > +{
> > + if (size < SZ_1M) {
> > + if (size & (SZ_1K-1))
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu KB", size/SZ_1K, 10*(size & (SZ_1K-1))/SZ_1K);
> > + else
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu KB", size/SZ_1K);
>
> I would add some spaces here and there for the sake of readability.
I think it's perfectly readable, skipping the whitespace for numeric
literals is standard style. Linus himself does that occasionally, see:
94a2bc0f611c ("arm64: add 'runtime constant' support")
static inline void __runtime_fixup_ptr(void *where, unsigned long val)
{
__le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
__runtime_fixup_16(p, val);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+1, val >> 16);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+2, val >> 32);
__runtime_fixup_16(p+3, val >> 48);
__runtime_fixup_caches(where, 4);
}
Or:
938df695e98d ("vsprintf: associate the format state with the format pointer")
+ unsigned int shift = 32 - size*8;
which uses visual grouping to make arithmethic expressions more
readable.
>
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (size < SZ_1G) {
>
> Can be written in one line as
>
> } else if (...) {
Done. (See delta patch below.)
>
> Ditto for the rest.
>
> > + if (size & (SZ_1M-1))
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu MB", size/SZ_1M, 10*(size & (SZ_1M-1))/SZ_1M);
> > + else
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu MB", size/SZ_1M);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (size < SZ_1T) {
> > + if (size & (SZ_1G-1))
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu GB", size/SZ_1G, 10*(size & (SZ_1G-1))/SZ_1G);
> > + else
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu GB", size/SZ_1G);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (size & (SZ_1T-1))
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu TB", size/SZ_1T, 10*(size & (SZ_1T-1))/SZ_1T);
> > + else
> > + pr_cont(" %4llu TB", size/SZ_1T);
> > +}
>
> Don't you want to use string_helpers.h provided API?
> string_get_size().
I don't think string_get_size() knows the fine distinction between:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] 256 KB device reserved
and:
BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] 256.0 KB device reserved
"256 KB" is exactly 256 KB, while "256.0 KB" denotes a value that is a
bit larger than 256 KB but rounds down to 256 KB at 1 KB granularity.
When reading platform boot logs it's useful to know when such values
are exact, at a glance.
Thanks,
Ingo
====================>
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 7f600d32a999..67a477203c97 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -213,22 +213,19 @@ static void e820_print_size(u64 size)
else
pr_cont(" %4llu KB", size/SZ_1K);
return;
- }
- if (size < SZ_1G) {
+ } else if (size < SZ_1G) {
if (size & (SZ_1M-1))
pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu MB", size/SZ_1M, 10*(size & (SZ_1M-1))/SZ_1M);
else
pr_cont(" %4llu MB", size/SZ_1M);
return;
- }
- if (size < SZ_1T) {
+ } else if (size < SZ_1T) {
if (size & (SZ_1G-1))
pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu GB", size/SZ_1G, 10*(size & (SZ_1G-1))/SZ_1G);
else
pr_cont(" %4llu GB", size/SZ_1G);
return;
- }
- if (size & (SZ_1T-1))
+ } else if (size & (SZ_1T-1))
pr_cont(" %4llu.%01llu TB", size/SZ_1T, 10*(size & (SZ_1T-1))/SZ_1T);
else
pr_cont(" %4llu TB", size/SZ_1T);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-21 18:51 [PATCH 00/29] x86/boot/e820: Assorted E820 table handling features and cleanups Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 01/29] x86/boot/e820: Remove inverted boolean logic from the e820_nomerge() function name, rename it to e820_type_mergeable() Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/29] x86/boot/e820: Simplify e820__print_table() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 5:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-15 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/29] x86/boot/e820: Simplify the PPro Erratum #50 workaround Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 04/29] x86/boot/e820: Mark e820__print_table() static Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/29] x86/boot/e820: Print gaps in the E820 table Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-22 6:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-16 9:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 06/29] x86/boot/e820: Make the field separator space character part of e820_print_type() Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 07/29] x86/boot/e820: Print out sizes of E820 memory ranges Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-05-15 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-16 9:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-22 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-15 11:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 08/29] x86/boot/e820: Print E820_TYPE_RAM entries as ... RAM entries Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-22 6:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-15 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 7:06 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-15 11:19 ` [PATCH 30/29] x86/boot/e820: Unify e820_print_type() and e820_type_to_string() Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 09/29] x86/boot/e820: Call the PCI gap a 'gap' in the boot log printout Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 10/29] x86/boot/e820: Use 'u64' consistently instead of 'unsigned long long' Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 11/29] x86/boot/e820: Remove pointless early_panic() indirection Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 12/29] x86/boot/e820: Clean up confusing and self-contradictory verbiage around E820 related resource allocations Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 13/29] x86/boot/e820: Improve e820_print_type() messages Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 14/29] x86/boot/e820: Clean up __e820__range_add() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 15/29] x86/boot/e820: Clean up __refdata use " Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 16/29] x86/boot/e820: Remove unnecessary header inclusions Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 17/29] x86/boot/e820: Standardize e820 table index variable names under 'idx' Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 10:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:32 ` [PATCH 31/29] x86/boot/e820: Move index increments outside accessors in e820__update_table() Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 11:37 ` [PATCH 17/29] x86/boot/e820: Standardize e820 table index variable names under 'idx' Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 18/29] x86/boot/e820: Change struct e820_table::nr_entries type from __u32 to u32 Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:51 ` [PATCH 19/29] x86/boot/e820: Standardize e820 table index variable types under 'u32' Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 15:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 20/29] x86/boot/e820: Clean up e820__setup_pci_gap()/e820_search_gap() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 16:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 21/29] x86/boot/e820: Change e820_search_gap() to search for the highest-address PCI gap Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 22/29] x86/boot/e820: Rename gap_start/gap_size to max_gap_start/max_gap_start in e820_search_gap() et al Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 23/29] x86/boot/e820: Simplify & clarify __e820__range_add() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 24/29] x86/boot/e820: Standardize __init/__initdata tag placement Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 25/29] x86/boot/e820: Simplify append_e820_table() and remove restriction on single-entry tables Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 26/29] x86/boot/e820: Remove e820__range_remove()'s unused return parameter Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 27/29] x86/boot/e820: Simplify the e820__range_remove() API Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-15 11:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 28/29] x86/boot/e820: Make sure e820_search_gap() finds all gaps Ingo Molnar
2025-04-21 18:52 ` [PATCH 29/29] x86/boot/e820: Treat non-type-2 'reserved' E820 region types as E820_TYPE_RESERVED Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 3:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-15 10:04 ` [PATCH -v2 29/29] x86/boot/e820: Introduce E820_TYPE_13 and treat it as a device region Ingo Molnar
2025-04-22 6:58 ` [PATCH 00/29] x86/boot/e820: Assorted E820 table handling features and cleanups Arnd Bergmann
2025-05-15 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCXFdvWiNW94F24R@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).