From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B5372617 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 13:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747314982; cv=none; b=tPobQ+1AFbD4gH/yh73+unFyYS87pQtNsq9ptCLeAesawx8tt6nQ9o8GmBlkMKqo8J49idvPv7v3EAqIAey2WVLfaDyAOkb4v9hN5hdem/YES5vdk96ng9lQqiaILv1lq+xmimY+hfLjE32rgFGrgc6O4lTirxd8P8MjoeITLLw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747314982; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pcg7aWx21FQxxU7XScMbUw1DC84e6I94kk7C7NITPB8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tl17Mouhue4989hQEZ/L3inxk8NQTBolyhTWOfBGjEXjjDXMmqwTCqeIduRyhhs+GCs1J9KWyngS0S+l1UDb1It9TTNp3QfoTikR52LFufL+FLqVAB7TbCF1EZFOSEvqurTv2WtMLCA1X95rbJZR8M7ZrLLqHHxDeGEqK8OcDIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=So7VsZR4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="So7VsZR4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88785C4CEE7; Thu, 15 May 2025 13:16:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747314979; bh=pcg7aWx21FQxxU7XScMbUw1DC84e6I94kk7C7NITPB8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=So7VsZR41VLN54nBmGdS+3XoUvmynVUbWQFwLBI+97YFXzbIYWUQrUOk8fHFwJJIF V+r6lk2/FBUw71nCzzLhyqT7K013RBdYAHkFkj/r5lFMZUY+LmsTg1RKEdL0I48AQi AyP6uI9Rt41BGAR40Drubhr3W1p1yAlUHKlU1xQRDgTbev0icKzCpm/8So4HeTZIHu rxJmpH/+kgEmd+Bh50z4ICXDo7O5KoNw8dKLRrsZWOaItgxZMOOEPgY3WEaIcTPro9 n+ThiIoec27ei0KYDM8E4xH0HAvdosMCkRhuiXBFH8tcje5DG7dJCJI4Nj8wyuv9jt 2umc2hxWtC07g== Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:16:13 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Ard Biesheuvel , David Woodhouse , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] x86/kconfig: Rename x86_64_defconfig to defconfig.x86_64 and i386_defconfig to defconfig.i386 Message-ID: References: <20250506170924.3513161-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20250506170924.3513161-4-mingo@kernel.org> <0591fcab-fb19-451f-a27b-1b449b2af4b9@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0591fcab-fb19-451f-a27b-1b449b2af4b9@app.fastmail.com> * Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2025, at 19:09, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Editing the defconfigs with shell filename completion is unnecessarily > > hard due to bad naming: if one remembers 'arch/x86/config/defconfig', > > it won't lead to the right files, because the defconfigs are > > prefixed with $(ARCH)_. > > > > Under the principle of 'higher order names should go first', prefix > > them with 'defconfig' and postfix them with .$(ARCH), and thus make > > all x86 configs match the arch/x86/config/defconfig.* pattern. > > I think this patch should be dropped completely, it as it causes > multiple problems: > > - it breaks existing scripts that use 'make x86_64_defconfig' > - it breaks 'make help' automatically printing the names > of the defconfigs > - it's inconsistent with the other architectures Oh well, I've removed patches #3 and #4. Thanks, Ingo