From: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
brauner@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, frederic@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, joel.granados@kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
avagin@google.com, mengensun@tencent.com, linux@weissschuh.net,
jlayton@kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com, kees@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC next v2 0/5] ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 13:48:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCcl9M-BgOJ86gVJ@example.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509072054.148257-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 07:20:49AM +0000, Chen Ridong wrote:
> The will-it-scale test case signal1 [1] has been observed. and the test
> results reveal that the signal sending system call lacks linearity.
The signal1 testcase is pretty synthetic. It sends a signal in a busy loop.
Do you have an example of a closer-to-life scenario where this delay
becomes a bottleneck ?
https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/blob/master/tests/signal1.c
> To further investigate this issue, we initiated a series of tests by
> launching varying numbers of dockers and closely monitored the throughput
> of each individual docker. The detailed test outcomes are presented as
> follows:
>
> | Dockers |1 |4 |8 |16 |32 |64 |
> | Throughput |380068 |353204 |308948 |306453 |180659 |129152 |
>
> The data clearly demonstrates a discernible trend: as the quantity of
> dockers increases, the throughput per container progressively declines.
> In-depth analysis has identified the root cause of this performance
> degradation. The ucouts module conducts statistics on rlimit, which
> involves a significant number of atomic operations. These atomic
> operations, when acting on the same variable, trigger a substantial number
> of cache misses or remote accesses, ultimately resulting in a drop in
> performance.
>
> Notably, even though a new user_namespace is created upon docker startup,
> the problem persists. This is because all these dockers share the same
> parent node, meaning that rlimit statistics continuously modify the same
> atomic variable.
>
> Currently, when incrementing a specific rlimit within a child user
> namespace by 1, the corresponding rlimit in the parent node must also be
> incremented by 1. Specifically, if the ucounts corresponding to a task in
> Docker B is ucount_b_1, after incrementing the rlimit of ucount_b_1 by 1,
> the rlimit of the parent node, init_ucounts, must also be incremented by 1.
> This operation should be ensured to stay within the limits set for the
> user namespaces.
>
> init_user_ns init_ucounts
> ^ ^
> | | |
> |<---- usr_ns_a(docker A)|usr_ns_a->ucount---->|
> | | |
> |<---- usr_ns_b(docker B)|usr_ns_a->ucount---->|
> ^
> |
> |
> |
> ucount_b_1
>
> What is expected is that dockers operating within separate namespaces
> should remain isolated and not interfere with one another. Regrettably,
> the current signal system call fails to achieve this desired level of
> isolation.
>
> Proposal:
>
> To address the aforementioned issues, the concept of implementing a cache
> for each namespace's rlimit has been proposed. If a cache is added for
> each user namespace's rlimit, a certain amount of rlimits can be allocated
> to a particular namespace in one go. When resources are abundant, these
> resources do not need to be immediately returned to the parent node. Within
> a user namespace, if there are available values in the cache, there is no
> need to request additional resources from the parent node.
>
> init_user_ns init_ucounts
> ^ ^
> | | |
> |<---- usr_ns_a(docker A)|usr_ns_a->ucount---->|
> | | |
> |<---- usr_ns_b(docker B)|usr_ns_b->ucount---->|
> ^ ^
> | |
> cache_rlimit--->|
> |
> ucount_b_1
>
>
> The ultimate objective of this solution is to achieve complete isolation
> among namespaces. After applying this patch set, the final test results
> indicate that in the signal1 test case, the performance does not
> deteriorate as the number of containers increases. This effectively meets
> the goal of linear scalability.
>
> | Dockers |1 |4 |8 |16 |32 |64 |
> | Throughput |381809 |382284 |380640 |383515 |381318 |380120 |
>
> Challenges:
>
> When checking the pending signals in the parent node using the command
> cat /proc/self/status | grep SigQ, the retrieved value includes the
> cached signal counts from its child nodes. As a result, the SigQ value
> in the parent node fails to accurately and instantaneously reflect the
> actual number of pending signals.
>
> # cat /proc/self/status | grep SigQ
> SigQ: 16/6187667
>
> TODO:
>
> Add cache for the other rlimits.
>
> [1] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/blob/master/tests/
>
> Chen Ridong (5):
> user_namespace: add children list node
> usernamespace: make usernamespace rcu safe
> user_namespace: add user_ns iteration helper
> uounts: factor out __inc_rlimit_get_ucounts/__dec_rlimit_put_ucounts
> ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount
>
> include/linux/user_namespace.h | 23 ++++-
> kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
> kernel/ucount.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/user.c | 2 +
> kernel/user_namespace.c | 60 ++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Rgrds, legion
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 7:20 [RFC next v2 0/5] ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 7:20 ` [RFC next v2 1/5] user_namespace: add children list node Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 7:20 ` [RFC next v2 2/5] usernamespace: make usernamespace rcu safe Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 7:20 ` [RFC next v2 3/5] user_namespace: add user_ns iteration helper Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 7:20 ` [RFC next v2 4/5] uounts: factor out __inc_rlimit_get_ucounts/__dec_rlimit_put_ucounts Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 7:20 ` [RFC next v2 5/5] ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount Chen Ridong
2025-05-09 20:18 ` [RFC next v2 0/5] " Andrew Morton
2025-05-12 10:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-13 1:48 ` Chen Ridong
2025-05-15 10:29 ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-15 12:04 ` Chen Ridong
2025-05-16 11:48 ` Alexey Gladkov [this message]
2025-05-19 13:39 ` Chen Ridong
2025-05-19 16:32 ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-05-21 1:32 ` Chen Ridong
2025-05-21 7:29 ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-05-22 22:48 ` Andrei Vagin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCcl9M-BgOJ86gVJ@example.org \
--to=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mengensun@tencent.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).