From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
willemb@google.com, sagi@grimberg.me, asml.silence@gmail.com,
almasrymina@google.com, kaiyuanz@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: devmem: remove min_t(iter_iov_len) in sendmsg
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 20:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCgIJSgv-yQzaHLl@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250517033951.GY2023217@ZenIV>
On 05/17, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 07:17:23PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > Wait, in the same commit there's
> > > + if (iov_iter_type(from) != ITER_IOVEC)
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > >
> > > shortly prior to the loop iter_iov_{addr,len}() are used. What am I missing now?
> >
> > Yeah, I want to remove that part as well:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250516225441.527020-1-stfomichev@gmail.com/T/#u
> >
> > Otherwise, sendmsg() with a single IOV is not accepted, which makes not
> > sense.
>
> Wait a minute. What's there to prevent a call with two ranges far from each other?
It is perfectly possible to have a call with two disjoint ranges,
net_devmem_get_niov_at should correctly resolve it to the IOVA in the
dmabuf. Not sure I understand why it's an issue, can you pls clarify?
What we want to have here is:
1. sendmsg(msg.msg_iov = [{ .iov_base = .., .iov_len = x }])
2. sendmsg(msg.msg_iov = [{ .iov_base = .., .iov_len = x },
{ .iov_base = .., .iov_len = y])
Both should be accepted. Currently only (2) works because of that ITER_IOVEC
check. Once I remove it, I hit the issue where iter_iov_len starts to
return too early.
(Documentation/networking/devmem.rst has a bit more info on the sendmsg UAPI
with dmabufs if that's still confusing)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-17 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-17 0:04 [PATCH net-next] net: devmem: remove min_t(iter_iov_len) in sendmsg Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-17 0:09 ` Al Viro
2025-05-17 1:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-17 2:06 ` Al Viro
2025-05-17 2:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-17 3:39 ` Al Viro
2025-05-17 3:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-05-17 4:05 ` Al Viro
2025-05-17 4:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-05-17 4:53 ` Mina Almasry
2025-05-20 15:10 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCgIJSgv-yQzaHLl@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox