Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN feature flag

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> wrote:

> Add a flag indicating whenever ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] SGX instruction
> is supported. This will be used by SGX driver to perform CPU
> SVN updates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h       | 1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c          | 1 +
>  tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 6c2c152d8a67..ed0c0fa5822a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -481,6 +481,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES (21*32 + 6) /* Heterogeneous Core Topology */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS	(21*32 + 7) /* Workload Classification */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM		(21*32 + 8) /* Avoid ZMM registers due to downclocking */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN	(21*32 + 9) /* Support for ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] instruction */

Please base the patches on the latest x86 tree, there's been two 
additions already in this area.

>  /*
>   * BUG word(s)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index 16f3ca30626a..a7e1fcedca3c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_PER_THREAD_MBA,		CPUID_ECX,  0, 0x00000010, 3 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_SGX1,			CPUID_EAX,  0, 0x00000012, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_SGX2,			CPUID_EAX,  1, 0x00000012, 0 },
> +	{ X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN,	CPUID_EAX, 10, 0x00000012, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_SGX_EDECCSSA,		CPUID_EAX, 11, 0x00000012, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE,		CPUID_EDX,  7, 0x80000007, 0 },
>  	{ X86_FEATURE_CPB,			CPUID_EDX,  9, 0x80000007, 0 },

So it should be obvious at a glance that this new line doesn't follow 
the coding convention of the surrounding lines...

Thanks,

	Ingo