[PATCH net-next v1 4/9] net: devmem: ksft: remove ksft_disruptive

Mina Almasry
2025-05-19T02:35:27Z

As far as I can tell the ksft_disruptive here is unnecessary. These
tests are largerly independent, and when one test fails, it's nice to
know the results from all the other test cases.

Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>

---
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devmem.py | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devmem.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devmem.py
index 7fc686cf47a2..f5d7809400ea 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devmem.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/devmem.py
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_exit
from lib.py import ksft_eq, KsftSkipEx
from lib.py import NetDrvEpEnv
from lib.py import bkg, cmd, rand_port, wait_port_listen
-from lib.py import ksft_disruptive

def require_devmem(cfg):
@@ -19,7 +18,6 @@ def require_devmem(cfg):
raise KsftSkipEx("Test requires devmem support")

-@ksft_disruptive
def check_rx(cfg) -> None:
cfg.require_ipver("6")
require_devmem(cfg)
@@ -34,7 +32,6 @@ def check_rx(cfg) -> None:
ksft_eq(socat.stdout.strip(), "hello\nworld")

-@ksft_disruptive
def check_tx(cfg) -> None:
cfg.require_ipver("6")
require_devmem(cfg)
--
2.49.0.1101.gccaa498523-goog