linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, ctshao@google.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf: Fix the throttle error of some clock events
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:39:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEE7ug56bPS_ZJUQ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604171554.3909897-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>


* kan.liang@linux.intel.com <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Both ARM and IBM CI reports RCU stall, which can be reproduced by the
> below perf command.
>   perf record -a -e cpu-clock -- sleep 2
> 
> The issue is introduced by the generic throttle patch set, which
> unconditionally invoke the event_stop() when throttle is triggered.
> 
> The cpu-clock and task-clock are two special SW events, which rely on
> the hrtimer. The throttle is invoked in the hrtimer handler. The
> event_stop()->hrtimer_cancel() waits for the handler to finish, which is
> a deadlock. Instead of invoking the stop(), the HRTIMER_NORESTART should
> be used to stop the timer.
> 
> There may be two ways to fix it.
> - Introduce a PMU flag to track the case. Avoid the event_stop in
>   perf_event_throttle() if the flag is detected.
>   It has been implemented in the
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250528175832.2999139-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
>   The new flag was thought to be an overkill for the issue.
> - Add a check in the event_stop. Return immediately if the throttle is
>   invoked in the hrtimer handler. Rely on the existing HRTIMER_NORESTART
>   method to stop the timer.
> 
> The latter is implemented here.
> 
> Move event->hw.interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS before the stop(). It makes
> the order the same as perf_event_unthrottle(). Except the patch, no one
> checks the hw.interrupts in the stop(). There is no impact from the
> order change.
> 
> Reported-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250527161656.GJ2566836@e132581.arm.com/
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/djxlh5fx326gcenwrr52ry3pk4wxmugu4jccdjysza7tlc5fef@ktp4rffawgcw/
> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8e8f51d8-af64-4d9e-934b-c0ee9f131293@linux.ibm.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Any idea which commit introduced this bug?

Was it:

  9734e25fbf5a perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group
 
plus the followup driver updates?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-05  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-04 17:15 [PATCH V3] perf: Fix the throttle error of some clock events kan.liang
2025-06-04 20:08 ` Ian Rogers
2025-06-04 23:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-05 13:46   ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-05 16:58     ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-05 18:45     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-05 20:24       ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-05 20:46         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-05 23:50           ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-06  0:39             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-06 13:05               ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-06 17:42                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-06 18:38                   ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-06 18:40                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-05  6:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-06-05 13:51   ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEE7ug56bPS_ZJUQ@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=aishwarya.tcv@arm.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ctshao@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).