From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Toshiyuki Sato <fj6611ie@fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v1] printk: nbcon: Allow reacquire during panic
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:15:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEf3t7Z4z3g7mHdg@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606185549.900611-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On Fri 2025-06-06 21:01:49, John Ogness wrote:
> If a console printer is interrupted during panic, it will never
> be able to reacquire ownership in order to perform and cleanup.
> That in itself is not a problem, since the non-panic CPU will
> simply quiesce in an endless loop within nbcon_reacquire_nobuf().
>
> However, in this state, platforms that do not support a true NMI
> to interrupt the quiesced CPU will not be able to shutdown that
> CPU from within panic(). This then causes problems for such as
> being unable to load and run a kdump kernel.
>
> Fix this by allowing non-panic CPUs to reacquire ownership using
> a direct acquire. Then the non-panic CPUs can successfullyl exit
> the nbcon_reacquire_nobuf() loop and the console driver can
> perform any necessary cleanup. But more importantly, the CPU is
> no longer quiesced and is free to process any interrupts
> necessary for panic() to shutdown the CPU.
>
> All other forms of acquire are still not allowed for non-panic
> CPUs since it is safer to have them avoid gaining console
> ownership that is not strictly necessary.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/SN6PR02MB4157A4C5E8CB219A75263A17D46DA@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
The patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
I am going to wait few days for a potential feedback and then
queue it for 6.17 unless anyone complains.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 18:55 [PATCH printk v1] printk: nbcon: Allow reacquire during panic John Ogness
2025-06-10 0:10 ` Michael Kelley
2025-06-10 9:15 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2025-06-17 10:31 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEf3t7Z4z3g7mHdg@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=fj6611ie@fujitsu.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox