From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42ACB23AB90; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749631377; cv=none; b=LvplTdp5dt3hikXOcgnxabT9MGHXYSMbAK6xQ/8FO6IEbtVxw4mN6t/f123LCvKHjvbEf61T/zR75WymD60ewn12xxELLLBzuiLyXvDokV9DAkuRD0+kU7Z8nuDAhE5iYwulyh7KyYMMwNBD3AWG7B3ZwukIyWGUS6RkU2SiFuA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749631377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kAIWVDwlGAt3Hhgl8IRvo7RYS5PwtQyzoO9pObT1hMo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oUoRlzjEYFlmE/VeHKk6T2j2y93sJKOtQ9NzyFKsjOXE8B1AoISFLxqrMLJCMykZHA02yCccAD/06N22sz0tl8EX3gBvo/4kryYE4+L9KGNLJSxAFNez09W2js9+SV3mMKYK907hLmGSUSAuMquLJaV1MHLohOhaxS2MdB4L5d4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: m8RwiiFxRZOtjU0w77N5VQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: C3yqfSsLQ5ux3zqwGrcKRw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11460"; a="54394828" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,227,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="54394828" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2025 01:42:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: I6apgXWYQ7eJanrq1jDrqw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wOzc54R/TkiIBIkA8br62g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,227,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="147119752" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jun 2025 01:42:52 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uPH2m-00000005aXC-3eUi; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:42:48 +0300 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:42:48 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lothar Rubusch Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, corbet@lwn.net, lucas.p.stankus@gmail.com, lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] iio: accel: adxl313: introduce channel buffer Message-ID: References: <20250601172139.59156-1-l.rubusch@gmail.com> <20250601172139.59156-3-l.rubusch@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Lothar Rubusch wrote: > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 9:08 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 8:21 PM Lothar Rubusch wrote: > > > > > > Add a scan_mask and scan_index to the iio channel. The scan_index > > > > IIO > > > > > prepares the buffer usage. According to the datasheet, the ADXL313 > > > uses 13 bit in full resolution. Add signedness, storage bits and > > > > bits > > ...OR... > > 13-bit wide data field > > > > > endianness. > > As this is getting very annoying, I tried to set something up > involving checkpatch, codespell and ispell. But I guess w/o > grammatical checking. Just, in case, do I miss some simple tooling > here, any suggestions? > > As a consequence, the alternative in the year 2025 is probably using > chatGPT for the commit messages and we probably never will have this > discussion anymore. Hum... ? It would be nice to have tool and not waste time on the commit message unification. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko