From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:12:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFQMrXRzui58krqA@zinc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025061817-jacket-nacho-50d6@gregkh>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:26:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 11:15:55PM +0900, Kisub Choe wrote:
> > Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_setBLANK' to
>
> That doesn't rename anything :(
Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
>
>
>
> > conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl
> >
> > CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
> > pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
> > par = info->par;
> > output = &par->output;
> > - return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
> > + return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
> > }
> >
> > static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> > @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> > crtc->ypanstep = 1;
> > crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
> >
> > - output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> > + output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> > hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
>
> Why do we even need this function pointer? Why not just do the check
> above when it is called instead of this indirection?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Dear Greg,
Here is the updated patch with revised commit message. No code changes.
Regards,
Kisub Choe.
From 9c32c6f5091c8babe54bfde7b3a6de47d9026a55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:55:00 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'
Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl
CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>
Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
par = info->par;
output = &par->output;
- return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
+ return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
}
static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
crtc->ypanstep = 1;
crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
- output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
+ output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
/* chip specific phase */
sm750_dev->accel.de_wait = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
index 9cf8b3d30aac..40051798efbf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ struct lynxfb_output {
*/
void *priv;
- int (*proc_setBLANK)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
+ int (*proc_set_blank)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
};
struct lynxfb_par {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 14:15 [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK' Kisub Choe
2025-06-18 14:26 ` Greg KH
2025-06-19 13:12 ` Kisub Choe [this message]
2025-06-19 13:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2025-06-19 13:49 ` Kisub Choe
2025-06-19 13:52 ` Greg KH
2025-06-19 14:22 ` Kisub Choe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFQMrXRzui58krqA@zinc \
--to=kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).