From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429E58632B; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750448214; cv=none; b=rJgVZI6ZjdUAqxB8sqH4v45iWALBY6oWonHbZJFtwrLOjzIgtN0ouSimSFrbkZk58f5g2WGv3hBEVGy9j6XdsyRAE7kT8Q2DP7nTxeNq8ARAhGGkPj3G2F79p/eHJKBIvdyruTIOdjV9HDRHbZbbP8Gh06e0JTOiXKKH2vbxCK8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750448214; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NvZm0pQnEMk9DM/K7roC2F0CdvDSkvQc1kyaCnfCCa0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PhYectIVfeBrnMKV591SkbiWEesCzT6RvWr8WZq9n5UZnBZuBx7HoebzT6g4W7wFDHlwTtGCNNCeiddX6xh+9DMYncbbSpakIlSSRMpaihHY6KIMpFMXUHXNuitXzmg0Kc/fvgUEvNWvh3vzW8MTDvHA4FzIXdIK8Jy11mdlMoU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=h77SFSCH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h77SFSCH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 666B0C4CEE3; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:36:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750448213; bh=NvZm0pQnEMk9DM/K7roC2F0CdvDSkvQc1kyaCnfCCa0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h77SFSCH+5ox59hry2GfbsJ2hgdHFJ4XoYwU8MrpLCwgvJzKv2T6qjwGOHDs3i8yy L5vVklL4WZghlzKmLTV6ZUP6K6qpUgtWK3AJD3QtrVR6yOV96+0MwzQFCx7nXBd2ZJ KVnnSjK+u+E1o03V/nhxoJXrXnnO70pFB3mHLXWn5eG4LkFSoUCeNpXums6Ou4pki+ lomB9bOTe+635bXH/+OPwCqh04oIr30UC+EaQyN1nN5xl4B/9STQcPelGRAn7qH0h5 xOpvY4S9WgGJn1hg/rzImHFeq0WEGnu++e9glEXQ9MZpamQeJ3ck/N0AWqgTVMFXDV AGL0Am826IKjQ== Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:36:52 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process Message-ID: References: <20250619002034.97007-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250619002034.97007-1-irogers@google.com> Hi Ian, On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 05:20:33PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > Name the noploop process "perf-noploop" so that tests can easily check > for its existence. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers > --- > tools/perf/tests/workloads/noploop.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/noploop.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/noploop.c > index 940ea5910a84..8b954d466083 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/noploop.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/noploop.c > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include I'm afraid it'd introduce a build failure on musl. Please see https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250611092542.F4ooE2FL@linutronix.de/ I think would be enough. Thanks, Namhyung > #include > #include "../tests.h" > > @@ -16,6 +18,7 @@ static int noploop(int argc, const char **argv) > { > int sec = 1; > > + prctl(PR_SET_NAME, "perf-noploop"); > if (argc > 0) > sec = atoi(argv[0]); > > -- > 2.50.0.rc2.701.gf1e915cc24-goog >