From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/10] x86/fred: Pass event data to the NMI entry point from KVM
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:18:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFXsPVIKi6wFUB6x@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7acedeba-9c90-403c-8985-0247981bf2b5@zytor.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 2025-06-19 15:57, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > On 6/19/2025 3:45 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> > > On 6/19/2025 3:15 PM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I want to say that the event data for IRQ has to be zero until the
> > > > architecture changes — Similar to the /* Reserved, must be 0 */ comment
> > > > in asm_fred_entry_from_kvm().
> > > >
> > >
> > > FRED spec says:
> > >
> > > For any other event, the event data are not currently defined and will
> > > be zero until they are.
> > >
> > > So "Event data not defined for IRQ thus 0."
> >
> > I am fine with this. Not *defined* removes the ambiguity.
> >
>
> So I was thinking about this, and wonder: how expensive is it to get the
> event data exit information out of VMX? If it is not very expensive, it
> would arguably be a good thing to future-proof by fetching that information,
> even if it is currently always zero.
It's trivially easy to do in KVM, and the cost of the VMREAD should be less than
20 cycles. So quite cheap in the grand scheme. If VMREAD is more costly than
that, then we have bigger problems :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 21:48 [PATCH v7 00/10] x86: Add support for NMI-source reporting with FRED Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] x86/fred: Provide separate IRQ vs. NMI wrappers for entry from KVM Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 3:53 ` Xin Li
2025-06-19 21:35 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] x86/fred: Pass event data to the NMI entry point " Sohil Mehta
2025-06-13 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-13 15:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 5:02 ` Xin Li
2025-06-19 22:15 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 22:45 ` Xin Li
2025-06-19 22:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-20 22:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-20 23:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-20 23:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-23 15:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-23 16:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] x86/cpufeatures: Add the CPUID feature bit for NMI-source reporting Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 5:06 ` Xin Li
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] x86/nmi: Extend the registration interface to include the NMI-source vector Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] x86/nmi: Assign and register NMI-source vectors Sohil Mehta
2025-07-07 13:21 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-07-07 20:00 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-08 7:30 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-07-11 0:32 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] x86/nmi: Add support to handle NMIs with source information Sohil Mehta
2025-07-07 13:50 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-07-07 20:32 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] x86/nmi: Prepare for the new NMI-source vector encoding Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 7:43 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-19 22:23 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-19 22:54 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] x86/nmi: Enable NMI-source for IPIs delivered as NMIs Sohil Mehta
2025-07-08 18:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-10 22:04 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-10 22:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-24 22:59 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] perf/x86: Enable NMI-source reporting for perfmon Sohil Mehta
2025-06-12 21:48 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] x86/nmi: Print source information with the unknown NMI console message Sohil Mehta
2025-06-13 7:06 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] x86: Add support for NMI-source reporting with FRED Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 15:21 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-07 13:56 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-07-07 20:33 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFXsPVIKi6wFUB6x@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).