From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Daniel Díaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:21:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623090642.GAaFkZIq__HR0FJE-0@fat_crate.local>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:06:42AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:25:36AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
> >
> > A recent refresh of the defconfigs got rid of the following
> > (unset) config:
> >
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Innocuous as it seems, when the config file is saved again the
> > behavior is changed so that CONFIG_64BIT=y.
> >
> > Currently,
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > CONFIG_64BIT=y
> >
> > whereas previously (and with this patch):
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Fixes: 0e11f689ec03 ("x86/kconfig/32: Refresh defconfig")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> No SOB by Daniel?
Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes
and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs:
Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"), it should be standalone
patch. I borrowed the commit message. So, whatever you prefer: I can send
it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers can do themselves
the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend it as mine.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 7:25 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-06-23 9:21 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-06-23 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-06-23 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox