From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B1E1F5617 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 20:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750710003; cv=none; b=Ev+GNgiujhRLaLJpRHQu93CNcmD9GgKXiXcSqPA3sBlSnNYfgJSUtQGw0dVEPQPFnVHOpJvtf2hvY1e1VTadCey/Kk78xqlONbMFHFivIOBBAoHmZSRRfXTo34ud7d5GZ3DYJqaltr6+NbfEcihlxQkcT1dMXKhaiAek5mwNwKU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750710003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yFEuTU9pYo/Ex+4VAEd2jxsQpXFnO25H/xgn5cagRwU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W5mfld089GdBhSW70Tl3ExowT0duD/abZWCCLsCB/C90NkQesFmOaYPVJr7+H+CVsgw0dkGZ1A+z7mql+kzYlDtRQ9IlbG4G2E+MuV5Dheo4nh+rpXizJlM3lZiR5AyDkg8eaIDyY/fglwc1YurhVQsQK9xBEmYFa+5J07SLLRA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L6wTUewF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L6wTUewF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4B7EC4CEEA; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 20:20:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750710002; bh=yFEuTU9pYo/Ex+4VAEd2jxsQpXFnO25H/xgn5cagRwU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L6wTUewFUDNCtHB4oJx0wXgrHT6YZuOllc6p2qDz8aBFO+y4pY6pHApSoHh0nvrsG zYD3LfBRbdoqTBBamEoH8cnU8Mjvspc9ZaQXoka5BbHsNRFUhHMfr0nh1VUhz1ZJPN 52+8WrP7QfBXB9mceg6N2guNsszk8ctG4ZQe2SPdtHJAzFFPeTAGKlKHJfxvyJj/y1 wY7iEjdgD26AiUFr1WIDc4IcNBIGvGHiPQBqaB3kTeyAtKz5P8c0tWgJgs7jOxpQb/ 2YrIlsJLo3tz7V07ytAgsdGVT/I57O3S5DacaLsGwXJLilRePpbhBXDN9TS+RnfTac vSi7wHfJDFf9w== Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 10:20:01 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] sched/deadline: Return EBUSY if dl_bw_cpus is zero Message-ID: References: <20250620203234.3349930-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20250620203234.3349930-6-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250620203234.3349930-6-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 04:32:20PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > - if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, old_bw, new_bw)) > + // Hotplugged CPUs coming online do an enqueue but are not a part of any > + // root domain containing cpu_active() CPUs. So in this case, don't mess > + // with accounting and we can retry later. > + if (!cpus || __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, old_bw, new_bw)) > return -EBUSY; Maybe match the comment style in the file? Thanks. -- tejun