From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EEA22258C; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750748589; cv=none; b=RfrbfyiFkYTIHCuD2NkBXmdxIWTLEPFOO+l5HVRpkZQQOk9dFng006Nril4QfzGtD3+GEGnaPpDBpUGcQx/m3+4zb3gMxtxn2UY5TlNwmBLH1sevO7Ez7tLGldrgYoLZjMYfWrgZh2ugiP4DdLJGdQJ2Hia4zRNTUDOW+7o8EZA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750748589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XOD1QPRKZMAXGA5MaZaHtwrD+CxKUTaDpa/4tHaEFoQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sS98DCop9u7uL7lKGGhinpJ+K1x7eQ7eraccb6mSU2oqHImGFfn5LwY9FobK8uCpyIZtPmIDaqSvG2yoCrcYX69OXNTS3c055QHAVyJmkx8PNFhM+iTYBLDZAEZurl9g6e4AjEuuVXRqoRLcvQHpFdi7sdLinfbd6ThgC6qFMy4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=yBONtD2M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="yBONtD2M" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76BD14C2D3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:02:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1750748580; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Cp+L8jxaNWQ/VZWl/gG/gGy4pfGeCsfwYLw/hzTr0s4=; b=yBONtD2MqCr2UZsn+GD7EgMSDf7AVZG9j81sywJhaKCU4GMLeQTJoUnQvf33TZz+BFtdYp bLB7ulGAqfV2UaVYuqf8ZylbkKCV8NDEYZ46dkaU5c9RCSBT02lP7+jMrNC52guvbk5UZ9 xHkU+iL8P912cWtahighLbcC7YPLd6RGQ1G1A3j1UM7RkiZm7KR2XthxunNgkH7J1r6O0Q rBuKqn4A3NhyhPPaeAZEsmXJvf4ycVKkffIUNwy2mtc54E1Hs5DI3JjqaLUtPKXGpXJLf3 /aZqGJl+YKPczSppDJs08SCeonYcrFesOrCvy2eoOZAwVZyT2iTvS1BweLzWzQ== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e75e798f; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:02:39 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/355] 5.10.239-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20250623130626.716971725@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250623130626.716971725@linuxfoundation.org> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 03:03:21PM +0200: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.239 release. > There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.239-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Aside of the build problem on arm64 (and a resume bug on our end that seems to have gotten more likely, but does not look caused by this update) this looks good to me: Tested 7b5e3f5b0ebc ("Linux 5.10.239-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet -- Dominique Martinet