From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm,hugetlb: Change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFuqAHvBSslOuEMQ@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45d66a0c-a5ed-4894-999c-0ed5b732ebb0@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 04:09:51PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> > - /*
> > - * hugetlb_wp() requires page locks of pte_page(vmf.orig_pte) and
> > - * pagecache_folio, so here we need take the former one
> > - * when folio != pagecache_folio or !pagecache_folio.
> > - */
> > + /* hugetlb_wp() requires page locks of pte_page(vmf.orig_pte) */
> > folio = page_folio(pte_page(vmf.orig_pte));
> > - if (folio != pagecache_folio)
> > - if (!folio_trylock(folio)) {
> > - need_wait_lock = 1;
> > - goto out_ptl;
> > - }
> > -
> > + folio_lock(folio);
> > folio_get(folio);
>
> Just realized that this won't work for this patch here, as we are holding
> the PTL.
>
> In patch #2 you do the right thing.
Yap, missed that.
I might have to do the lock-unlock-dance here, and then in patch#2 move
it to hugetlb_wp.
Sounds reasonable?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 12:30 [PATCH v2 0/5] Misc rework on hugetlb faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-06-20 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm,hugetlb: Change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping Oscar Salvador
2025-06-23 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 7:49 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-06-25 10:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-20 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm,hugetlb: Sort out folio locking in the faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-06-23 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 7:47 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-25 20:47 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-20 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm,hugetlb: Rename anon_rmap to new_anon_folio and make it boolean Oscar Salvador
2025-06-20 14:28 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-23 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 7:43 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-20 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop obsolete comment about non-present pte and second faults Oscar Salvador
2025-06-20 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop unlikelys from hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFuqAHvBSslOuEMQ@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).