From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA661401B; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751968882; cv=none; b=Oh/nBsURVLr8BS5/yzAAAj4iBYnNHDk/4Bn0GkWUFYPq69OGg580pv7by//NplQHgvy4rNO+ItEozDAmliV64ZvV10/+0O7cUnijpf7UfK3OsdSZ9hQ+YU0w+Ncw+c9TZMH0tVJuLOtrUok21WEg8qRoJw0Gyr71isFrjw3qVPM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751968882; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sQk61ZQ1hu+jGZJr0c68/AYxulChjc+cOl9+CHKTxGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rFUGkBsUUXUwbYkmVvVDXMhvkTI2OwD+YemHl0Raj13b6VphkApasLlxE1JjsEl/wAA1wOtOu4Y64OcF+y+/LmCbAXmXWOf+lAQe7SEc3Rk+lcEHu7m4wJ96YEvUxUfIx1Po8HtbCL84x7ZSUVeVoF0ZufR/9hLZoYoxFCoHcPw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AILA0yvy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AILA0yvy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1751968881; x=1783504881; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sQk61ZQ1hu+jGZJr0c68/AYxulChjc+cOl9+CHKTxGE=; b=AILA0yvyb8FLNjWodekSI9pOYjktcBW1hjHPVtKHuAevzvhikAC/B+15 0Iw0IFtqmo4pwvZswb6D4B4mxm2X4HeDK3ghrHF34myvrD7cDgj13gcf/ C6YwLUEjk1PH/L86BncQFpQkfch5I/ySal85uH0iPMHA/kGxOWc5g3sH1 0tYnIEcOqsf/6nmCa7f6EY7FMYNe/3xIGVnrPkaUYctQkXAI7tmhE+BlD LYWxnQi5eCSjRjIcIIwu83qwIxmgHztsO15kPp67WWgUvTcUSt0r5nEhn wIptayMZaVMPOCwMXzJVczP5E8W5Vh9FxynYsbynJBKDnu6H23uOQdwUq w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DAmq3YfkTJ+1/byT8dBrkQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Sw7BejvsR22gMviINx19EQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11487"; a="54329588" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,297,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="54329588" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2025 03:01:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eg1cFD5tSbKwDbgeOkpS6w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1Vaw5xiATBeYWGutaRxLwQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,297,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="159720161" Received: from cpetruta-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.244.230]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2025 03:01:11 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D81B5120898; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:01:08 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:01:08 +0000 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] treewide: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls Message-ID: References: <20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <00203f87-f90d-4a19-998d-1a6b015ea515@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00203f87-f90d-4a19-998d-1a6b015ea515@sirena.org.uk> Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:52:25AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > > pm-runtime-6.17-rc1 > > > So before merging these, please pull Rafael's tag. My thinking is indeed > > these would be best merged via the respective trees as there's some > > potential for conflicts (there are around 920 call sites modified here). > > Please if you're doing things like this in future could you send > individual serieses to each subsystem - it just makes everything > clearer, for those of us with multiple subsystems it makes life easier > and a series this big causes scaling issues with the tooling (it took > several minutes for b4 to figure out a base...). Thanks for the feedback. I guess at this phase it's really just mechanical and the added benefit of having a single cover letter is minimal. Right now it looks like only a few subsystems need v2 of this (drm, media and iio). -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus