linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list
@ 2025-07-18 10:07 wangzijie
  2025-07-18 10:07 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: directly add newly allocated pre-dirty nat entry to dirty set list wangzijie
  2025-07-21 17:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wangzijie @ 2025-07-18 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaegeuk, chao
  Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, bintian.wang, feng.han, wangzijie

__lookup_nat_cache follows LRU manner to move clean nat entry, when nat
entries are going to be dirty, no need to move them to tail of lru list.

Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 4b3d9070e..b9fbc6bf7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
 	struct nat_entry *new = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, ni->nid, true);
 
 	f2fs_down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
-	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, ni->nid);
+	e = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, ni->nid);
 	if (!e) {
 		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, NULL, true);
 		copy_node_info(&e->ni, ni);
@@ -2926,7 +2926,7 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
 		raw_ne = nat_in_journal(journal, i);
 
-		ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
+		ne = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, nid);
 		if (!ne) {
 			ne = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, nid, true);
 			__init_nat_entry(nm_i, ne, &raw_ne, true);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: directly add newly allocated pre-dirty nat entry to dirty set list
  2025-07-18 10:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list wangzijie
@ 2025-07-18 10:07 ` wangzijie
  2025-07-21 17:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list Jaegeuk Kim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wangzijie @ 2025-07-18 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaegeuk, chao
  Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, bintian.wang, feng.han, wangzijie

When we need to alloc nat entry and set it dirty, we can directly add it to
dirty set list(or initialize its list_head for new_ne) instead of adding it
to clean list and make a move. Introduce init_dirty flag to do it.

Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index b9fbc6bf7..b891be98b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static void __free_nat_entry(struct nat_entry *e)
 
 /* must be locked by nat_tree_lock */
 static struct nat_entry *__init_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
-	struct nat_entry *ne, struct f2fs_nat_entry *raw_ne, bool no_fail)
+	struct nat_entry *ne, struct f2fs_nat_entry *raw_ne, bool no_fail, bool init_dirty)
 {
 	if (no_fail)
 		f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nat_get_nid(ne), ne);
@@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ static struct nat_entry *__init_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 	if (raw_ne)
 		node_info_from_raw_nat(&ne->ni, raw_ne);
 
+	if (init_dirty) {
+		nm_i->nat_cnt[TOTAL_NAT]++;
+		return ne;
+	}
+
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
@@ -256,7 +261,7 @@ static struct nat_entry_set *__grab_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 }
 
 static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
-						struct nat_entry *ne)
+					struct nat_entry *ne, bool init_dirty)
 {
 	struct nat_entry_set *head;
 	bool new_ne = nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR;
@@ -275,6 +280,18 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 
 	set_nat_flag(ne, IS_PREALLOC, new_ne);
 
+	if (init_dirty) {
+		nm_i->nat_cnt[DIRTY_NAT]++;
+		set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, true);
+		spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+		if (new_ne)
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ne->list);
+		else
+			list_add_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
+		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+		return;
+    }
+
 	if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
 		goto refresh_list;
 
@@ -441,7 +458,7 @@ static void cache_nat_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
 	f2fs_down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
 	if (!e)
-		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, ne, false);
+		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, ne, false, false);
 	else
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_ino(e) != le32_to_cpu(ne->ino) ||
 				nat_get_blkaddr(e) !=
@@ -458,11 +475,13 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 	struct nat_entry *e;
 	struct nat_entry *new = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, ni->nid, true);
+	bool init_dirty = false;
 
 	f2fs_down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 	e = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, ni->nid);
 	if (!e) {
-		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, NULL, true);
+		init_dirty = true;
+		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, NULL, true, true);
 		copy_node_info(&e->ni, ni);
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, ni->blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
 	} else if (new_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
@@ -498,7 +517,7 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
 	nat_set_blkaddr(e, new_blkaddr);
 	if (!__is_valid_data_blkaddr(new_blkaddr))
 		set_nat_flag(e, IS_CHECKPOINTED, false);
-	__set_nat_cache_dirty(nm_i, e);
+	__set_nat_cache_dirty(nm_i, e, init_dirty);
 
 	/* update fsync_mark if its inode nat entry is still alive */
 	if (ni->nid != ni->ino)
@@ -2914,6 +2933,7 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
 	struct f2fs_journal *journal = curseg->journal;
 	int i;
+	bool init_dirty;
 
 	down_write(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
 	for (i = 0; i < nats_in_cursum(journal); i++) {
@@ -2924,12 +2944,15 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 		if (f2fs_check_nid_range(sbi, nid))
 			continue;
 
+		init_dirty = false;
+
 		raw_ne = nat_in_journal(journal, i);
 
 		ne = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, nid);
 		if (!ne) {
+			init_dirty = true;
 			ne = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, nid, true);
-			__init_nat_entry(nm_i, ne, &raw_ne, true);
+			__init_nat_entry(nm_i, ne, &raw_ne, true, true);
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -2944,7 +2967,7 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 			spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 		}
 
-		__set_nat_cache_dirty(nm_i, ne);
+		__set_nat_cache_dirty(nm_i, ne, init_dirty);
 	}
 	update_nats_in_cursum(journal, -i);
 	up_write(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list
  2025-07-18 10:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list wangzijie
  2025-07-18 10:07 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: directly add newly allocated pre-dirty nat entry to dirty set list wangzijie
@ 2025-07-21 17:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2025-07-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wangzijie; +Cc: chao, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, bintian.wang, feng.han

I think it'd be better to add a parameter like __lookup_nat_cache(for_dirty).

On 07/18, wangzijie wrote:
> __lookup_nat_cache follows LRU manner to move clean nat entry, when nat
> entries are going to be dirty, no need to move them to tail of lru list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 4b3d9070e..b9fbc6bf7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
>  	struct nat_entry *new = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, ni->nid, true);
>  
>  	f2fs_down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> -	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, ni->nid);
> +	e = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, ni->nid);
>  	if (!e) {
>  		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, NULL, true);
>  		copy_node_info(&e->ni, ni);
> @@ -2926,7 +2926,7 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  
>  		raw_ne = nat_in_journal(journal, i);
>  
> -		ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
> +		ne = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, nid);
>  		if (!ne) {
>  			ne = __alloc_nat_entry(sbi, nid, true);
>  			__init_nat_entry(nm_i, ne, &raw_ne, true);
> -- 
> 2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-21 17:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-18 10:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list wangzijie
2025-07-18 10:07 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: directly add newly allocated pre-dirty nat entry to dirty set list wangzijie
2025-07-21 17:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: avoid redundant clean nat entry move in lru list Jaegeuk Kim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).