From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<aik@amd.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 12:08:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHAPqdZKfdeEMDs2@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709040234.1773573-3-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 12:02:29PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> Add the iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper, which allows the caller
> to destroy an iommufd object created by userspace.
>
> This is useful on some destroy paths when the kernel caller finds the
> object should have been removed by userspace but is still alive. With
> this helper, the caller destroys the object but leave the object ID
> reserved (so called tombstone). The tombstone prevents repurposing the
> object ID without awareness of the original user.
>
> Since this happens for abnormal userspace behavior, for simplicity, the
> tombstoned object ID would be permanently leaked until
> iommufd_fops_release(). I.e. the original user gets an error when
> calling ioctl(IOMMU_DESTROY) on that ID.
>
> The first use case would be to ensure the iommufd_vdevice can't outlive
> the associated iommufd_device.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
With one nit:
> - while (!xa_empty(&ictx->objects)) {
> + for (;;) {
> unsigned int destroyed = 0;
> unsigned long index;
> + bool empty = true;
>
> + /*
> + * xa_for_each() will not return tomestones (zeroed entries),
> + * which prevent the xarray being empty. So use an empty flags
Since the first "empty" and the second "empty" are different things,
> + * instead of xa_empty() to indicate all entries are either
> + * NULLed or tomestoned.
> + */
let's write something like this (correcting typos too):
/*
* We can't use xa_empty(), as a tombstone (NULLed entry) would
* prevent it returning true, unlike xa_for_each() ignoring the
* NULLed entries. So use an empty flag instead of xa_empty() to
* indicate all entries are either NULLed or tombstoned.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 4:02 [PATCH v4 0/7] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iommufd/viommu: Roll back to use iommufd_object_alloc() for vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 7:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 18:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 17:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 7:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 19:08 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-07-11 15:02 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 19:39 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 21:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11 22:04 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-11 17:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iommufd: Add a pre_destroy() op for objects Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 7:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 17:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11 3:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-11 9:38 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 22:09 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 8:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12 2:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-12 17:47 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-14 16:40 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-14 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-14 17:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 18:03 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-12 2:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 8:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12 2:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 8:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-12 2:39 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-09 4:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
2025-07-10 8:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-10 9:25 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 3:12 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHAPqdZKfdeEMDs2@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).