linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/rmap: Add anon_vma lifetime debug check
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:05:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIb3In3G7XygrXNT@harry> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725-anonvma-uaf-debug-v2-1-bc3c7e5ba5b1@google.com>

On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 02:16:24PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> If an anon folio is mapped into userspace, its anon_vma must be alive,
> otherwise rmap walks can hit UAF.
> 
> There have been syzkaller reports a few months ago[1][2] of UAF in rmap
> walks that seems to indicate that there can be pages with elevated mapcount
> whose anon_vma has already been freed, but I think we never figured out
> what the cause is; and syzkaller only hit these UAFs when memory pressure
> randomly caused reclaim to rmap-walk the affected pages, so it of course
> didn't manage to create a reproducer.
> 
> Add a VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO() when we add/remove mappings of anonymous folios to
> hopefully catch such issues more reliably.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/67abaeaf.050a0220.110943.0041.GAE@google.com 
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/67a76f33.050a0220.3d72c.0028.GAE@google.com 
> 
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - applied akpm's fixup (use FOLIO_MAPPING_ANON, ...)
> - remove CONFIG_DEBUG_VM check and use folio_test_* helpers (David)
> - more verbose comment (Lorenzo)
> - replaced "page" mentions with "folio" in commit message
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250724-anonvma-uaf-debug-v1-1-29989ddc4e2a@google.com 
> ---

Oops, I'm late to the party.

A question; does it make sense to disable reuse of anon_vmas during
anon_vma_clone() to increase chances of detecting this? (of course,
for debugging-purpose only)

Regardless of that:
Acked-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon


>  include/linux/rmap.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
> index 20803fcb49a7..6cd020eea37a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
> @@ -449,6 +449,28 @@ static inline void __folio_rmap_sanity_checks(const struct folio *folio,
>  	default:
>  		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Anon folios must have an associated live anon_vma as long as they're
> +	 * mapped into userspace.
> +	 * Note that the atomic_read() mainly does two things:
> +	 *
> +	 * 1. In KASAN builds with CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG, it causes KASAN to
> +	 *    check that the associated anon_vma has not yet been freed (subject
> +	 *    to KASAN's usual limitations). This check will pass if the
> +	 *    anon_vma's refcount has already dropped to 0 but an RCU grace
> +	 *    period hasn't passed since then.
> +	 * 2. If the anon_vma has not yet been freed, it checks that the
> +	 *    anon_vma still has a nonzero refcount (as opposed to being in the
> +	 *    middle of an RCU delay for getting freed).
> +	 */
> +	if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_ksm(folio)) {
> +		unsigned long mapping = (unsigned long)folio->mapping;
> +		struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
> +
> +		anon_vma = (void *)(mapping - FOLIO_MAPPING_ANON);
> +		VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(atomic_read(&anon_vma->refcount) == 0, folio);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-28  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-25 12:16 [PATCH v2] mm/rmap: Add anon_vma lifetime debug check Jann Horn
2025-07-25 14:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-25 14:44   ` Jann Horn
2025-07-25 15:38     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-25 15:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-28  4:05 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-07-28  4:33   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-29  2:41     ` Harry Yoo
2025-07-28 14:12   ` Jann Horn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIb3In3G7XygrXNT@harry \
    --to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).