* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-07-30 12:35 ` Ronald Warsow
2025-07-30 13:09 ` Christian Heusel
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ronald Warsow @ 2025-07-30 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
conor, hargar, broonie
Hi
no regressions here on x86_64 (RKL, Intel 11th Gen. CPU)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-30 12:35 ` Ronald Warsow
@ 2025-07-30 13:09 ` Christian Heusel
2025-07-30 14:09 ` Jon Hunter
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heusel @ 2025-07-30 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 649 bytes --]
On 25/07/30 11:35AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Tested-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
Tested on the following hardware:
* a ThinkPad E14 Gen 3 with a AMD Ryzen 5 5500U CPU
* a Framework Laptop with a Ryzen AI 5 340
* a Framework Desktop
* a Steam Deck LCD Edition
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-30 12:35 ` Ronald Warsow
2025-07-30 13:09 ` Christian Heusel
@ 2025-07-30 14:09 ` Jon Hunter
2025-07-30 15:29 ` Mark Brown
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-07-30 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:35:08 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
120 tests: 120 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.15.9-rc1-gd9420fe2ce8c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 14:09 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-07-30 15:29 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-30 16:47 ` Achill Gilgenast
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-07-30 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 11:35:08AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 15:29 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-07-30 16:47 ` Achill Gilgenast
2025-07-30 17:21 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Achill Gilgenast @ 2025-07-30 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Achill Gilgenast
On Wed Jul 30, 2025 at 11:35 AM CEST, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested-By: Achill Gilgenast <fossdd@pwned.life>
Thank you! Builds on all Alpine architectures and boots on x86_64. No
regressions noticed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 16:47 ` Achill Gilgenast
@ 2025-07-30 17:21 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-07-30 20:08 ` Peter Schneider
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-07-30 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.15.9-rc1-gd9420fe2ce8c #33 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Jul 30 10:34:27 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 17:21 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-07-30 20:08 ` Peter Schneider
2025-07-30 20:51 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-07-30 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 30.07.2025 um 11:35 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Built wich Clang 20.1.8 this time, boots and works fine on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon
E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.15.9-rc1+ (root@linus.localdomain) (clang version 20.1.8
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261), LLD
20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)) #1
SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Jul 30 21:01:43 CEST 2025
[ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.15.9-rc1+
root=UUID=3842ebdd-e37f-4e4e-afd4-d7eb79b41984 ro quiet intel_iommu=on iommu=pt
vfio-pci.ids=10de:1201,10de:0e0c
[ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
[ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel
[ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD
[ 0.000000] Hygon HygonGenuine
[ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls
[ 0.000000] zhaoxin Shanghai
[ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000096fff] usable
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 20:08 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-07-30 20:51 ` Shuah Khan
2025-07-31 2:30 ` Justin Forbes
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-07-30 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 7/30/25 03:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-30 20:51 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-07-31 2:30 ` Justin Forbes
2025-07-31 2:39 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2025-07-31 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 11:35:08AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-31 2:30 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2025-07-31 2:39 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2025-07-31 8:36 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2025-07-31 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Hi Greg
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 6:53 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
6.15.9-rc1 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.15.9-rc1rv-gd9420fe2ce8c
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 15.1.1 20250425, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.45) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 31 10:55:42 JST 2025
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-31 2:39 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2025-07-31 8:36 ` Ron Economos
2025-07-31 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-07-31 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 7/30/25 02:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-31 8:36 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-07-31 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-31 19:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-08-01 1:31 ` Hardik Garg
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-07-31 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 at 15:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.15.9-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: d9420fe2ce8ce7d6f2f74f9b6608740432483932
* git describe: v6.15.8-93-gd9420fe2ce8c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.15.y/build/v6.15.8-93-gd9420fe2ce8c
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.15.7-188-g81bcc8b99854)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.15.7-188-g81bcc8b99854)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.15.7-188-g81bcc8b99854)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.15.7-188-g81bcc8b99854)
## Test result summary
total: 331512, pass: 309941, fail: 6639, skip: 14932, xfail: 0
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 138 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 27 passed, 7 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 39 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-31 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-07-31 19:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-08-01 1:31 ` Hardik Garg
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-07-31 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds, Miguel Ojeda
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:35:08 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.9 release.
> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:32:07 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review
2025-07-30 9:35 [PATCH 6.15 00/92] 6.15.9-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-31 19:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-08-01 1:31 ` Hardik Garg
2025-08-18 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.16 000/570] 6.16.2-rc1 review Hardik Garg
13 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-08-01 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, and perf tool builds fine for v6.15.9-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/570] 6.16.2-rc1 review
2025-08-01 1:31 ` Hardik Garg
@ 2025-08-18 22:51 ` Hardik Garg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-08-18 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hargar
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, gregkh, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.16.2-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread