From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Konstantin Belousov <kib@kib.kiev.ua>,
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/bhyve: Detect FreeBSD Bhyve hypervisor
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 18:51:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ4UEO3gRUiuD-4F@lx-t490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ff6b4cad51167c6226304483544a6828d3f7e0c.camel@infradead.org>
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 12:15 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> >
> > Which makes it, what, 0x4000_0001?
> >
> > I presume there's an agreement among all the hypervisors...?
>
> There is no such agreement about CPUID; by *coincidence* most of them
> seem to use 0x4000_0?01 as their feature leaf, but the feature bits in
> each such leaf are completely different and the guest doesn't look at a
> given leaf unless it knows that specific hypervisor. Which is why the
> 15-bit enlightenment is advertised differently by each hypervisor
> despite being precisely the same enlightenment across them all.
>
For what it takes, such hypervisor leaves, in the 0x40000000 range, will
be converted by the ongoing x86-cpuid-db CPUID parser work at some point.
(Another iteration of the CPUID parser is to be posted today.)
Thanks,
Ahmed
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 11:16 [RFC PATCH] x86/bhyve: Detect FreeBSD Bhyve hypervisor David Woodhouse
2025-08-13 21:07 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-14 10:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-14 11:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-14 16:51 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ4UEO3gRUiuD-4F@lx-t490 \
--to=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jhb@freebsd.org \
--cc=kib@kib.kiev.ua \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox