linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Miko.Lenczewski@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:39:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJIXmIgCGlWlHDNK@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <985f9d53-ea5e-4da0-9427-106a58be7f26@arm.com>

On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 09:16:31AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 05/08/2025 09:13, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> > This is a new version built on top of Yang Shi's work at [1]. Yang and I have
> > been discussing (disagreeing?) about the best way to implement the last 2
> > patches. So I've reworked them and am posting as RFC to illustrate how I think
> > this feature should be implemented, but I've retained Yang as primary author
> > since it is all based on his work. I'd appreciate feedback from Catalin and/or
> > Will on whether this is the right approach, so that hopefully we can get this
> > into shape for 6.18.
> 
> I forgot to mention that it applies on Linus's current master (it depends upon
> mm and arm64 changes that will first appear in v6.17-rc1 and are already merged
> in master). I'm using 89748acdf226 as the base.

It's fine as an RFC but, for upstream, please rebase on top of -rc1
rather than a random commit in the middle of the merging window. Also
note that many maintainers ignore new series posted during the merging
window.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-05 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-05  8:13 [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05  8:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] arm64: Enable permission change on arm64 kernel block mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-08-28 16:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-29  9:23     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05  8:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list Ryan Roberts
2025-08-28 16:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-05  8:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05 17:59   ` Yang Shi
2025-08-06  7:57     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-07  0:19       ` Yang Shi
2025-08-28 17:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-28 17:45     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-28 18:48       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-05  8:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 unsupported on secondary CPUs Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05 18:14   ` Yang Shi
2025-08-06  8:15     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-07  0:29       ` Yang Shi
2025-08-05  8:16 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05 14:39   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-08-05 14:52     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-05 18:37 ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJIXmIgCGlWlHDNK@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Miko.Lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).