From: Haylen Chu <heylenay@4d2.org>
To: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jinmei Wei <weijinmei@linux.spacemit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: spacemit: introduce i2s pre-clock and fix i2s clock
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 08:39:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJW3uvqI--Bwrld3@ketchup> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78351F50C5DA0C45+aJWaWKEyO_f2a6Kp@LT-Guozexi>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 02:34:00PM +0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 03:59:12AM +0000, Haylen Chu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 10:10:48AM +0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> > > Hi, Haylen!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 03:02:00AM +0000, Haylen Chu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 09:30:11AM +0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> > > > > Defining i2s_bclk and i2s_sysclk as fixed-rate clocks is insufficient
> > > > > for real I2S use cases.
> > > >
> > > > This is a little misleading: they're modeled as gates with fixed-factor
> > > > for now whose rate is calculated from their parents instead of defined
> > > > statically. You could avoid possible confusion by replacing "fixed-rate"
> > > > with "fixed-factor".
> > > >
> > > I'll change it in next version.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Moreover, the current I2S clock configuration does not work as expected
> > > > > due to missing parent clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds the missing parent clocks, defines i2s_sysclk as
> > > > > a DDN clock, and i2s_bclk as a DIV clock.
> > > > >
> > > > > The i2s_sysclk behaves as an M/N fractional divider in hardware,
> > > > > with an additional gate control.
> > > > >
> > > > > To properly model this, CCU_DDN_GATE_DEFINE is introduced.
> > > >
> > > > Could it be represented as a DDN clock taking a gate as parent? Just
> > > > like what is described in the published clock diagram. Generally I'd
> > > > like to avoid introducing more clock types, there're already a lot.
> > > Uh, our new chip(K3) may uses this macro that I introduced..
> > > so I don't wanna take a gate as parent everywhere..
> > > how about we leave it? ;)
> >
> > I wasn't proposing a workaround. What will go wrong if a gate is taken
> > as parent of DDN everywhere?
> I think this a bit troublesome...
I don't agree. It just costs one extra line and one extra macro.
> > Not to mention this DDN variant actually
> > duplicates the code in ccu_mix.c.
> >
> So I’ve ultimately decided not to introduce DDN_GATE.
> I’ll change the macro for i2s_sysclk_src from
> CCU_MUX_DEFINE to CCU_MUX_GATE_DEFINE.
>
> What do you think? From the clock tree perspective, this should be fine.
Thanks for the change, it's fine for me, too.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > The original DDN operations applied an implicit divide-by-2, which should
> > > > > not be a default behavior.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch removes that assumption, letting each clock define its
> > > > > actual behavior explicitly.
> > > > >
> > > > > The i2s_bclk is a non-linear, discrete divider clock.
> > > > > The previous macro only supported linear dividers,
> > > > > so CCU_DIV_TABLE_GATE_DEFINE is introduced to support
> > > > > the hardware accurately.
> > > >
> > > > The divider IS linear, from the perspective of functionality, it just
> > > > implies a 1/2 factor. Could it be represented as an usual divider and a
> > > > 1/2 fixed factor?
> > > ditto.
> > >
> > > I know you don't wanna introduce new macro..
> >
> > It's not about new macros. It's about new clock types. And the solution
> > I proposed for the divider with a factor isn't meant to be a workaround.
> >
> > For the divider's case, I think combining a fixed-factor and a normal
> > divider looks more clean than introducing a new LUT. It solves the
> > problem for K1, right?
> yes, It solves.
>
> >
> > > But K3 requires this, so whether it is introduced now or future,
> > > the final result is the same.
> >
> > Could you please confirm whether K3's dividers requiring this patch are
> > really non-linear or just imply a fixed-factor?
> I will confirm this point.
>
> If I send v2 without removing the CCU_DIV_TABLE_GATE_DEFINE macro,
> that would mean K3 really needs it.
Thanks, this will help.
> >
> > > Please leave it..
> > > >
> > > > > The I2S-related clock registers can be found here [1].
> > > >
> > > > So this patch actually does four separate things,
> > > >
> > > > - Introduce a gate-capable variant of DDN clocks
> > > > - Make the pre-divider of DDN clocks flexible
> > > > - Support looking up mappings between register values and divisors
> > > > through a table when calculating rates of dividers
> > > > - Fix the definition of i2s_bclk and i2s_sysclk
> > > >
> > > > IMHO it's better to split them into separate patches for clearness.
> > > Ok, I will split them into separate patches.
> >
> > Thanks, that'll be easier to review.
> >
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/soc/spacemit/k1-syscon.h b/include/soc/spacemit/k1-syscon.h
> > > > > index c59bd7a38e5b4219121341b9c0d9ffda13a9c3e2..253db8a602fe43a1109e2ba248af11109c7baa22 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/soc/spacemit/k1-syscon.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/soc/spacemit/k1-syscon.h
> > > > > @@ -29,10 +29,11 @@ to_spacemit_ccu_adev(struct auxiliary_device *adev)
> > > > > #define APBS_PLL3_SWCR3 0x12c
> > > > >
> > > > > /* MPMU register offset */
> > > > > +#define MPMU_FCCR 0x0008
> > > > > #define MPMU_POSR 0x0010
> > > > > -#define POSR_PLL1_LOCK BIT(27)
> > > > > -#define POSR_PLL2_LOCK BIT(28)
> > > > > -#define POSR_PLL3_LOCK BIT(29)
> > > > > +#define POSR_PLL1_LOCK BIT(27)
> > > > > +#define POSR_PLL2_LOCK BIT(28)
> > > > > +#define POSR_PLL3_LOCK BIT(29)
> > > >
> > > > This reformatting doesn't seem related to the patch.
> > > It's worth that create a new commit to reformatting it?
> >
> > IIRC, the indentation is intended to show the relationship between
> > register bits and offsets, which seems easier to read for me.
> Sry I ignore this..
>
> But isn’t the POSR prefix already sufficient to indicate the relationship?
I think the original form is easier to read, isn't it? Even if you don't
think so, this change obviously exceeds scope of this patch and please
separate a series for discussion.
> Have a nice day!
>
> - Troy
Best regards,
Haylen Chu
> > Do you
> > have a good reason to change it?
> >
> > > - Troy
> > > >
> > > > > #define MPMU_SUCCR 0x0014
> > > > > #define MPMU_ISCCR 0x0044
> > > > > #define MPMU_WDTPCR 0x0200
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.50.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Haylen Chu
> > > >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Haylen Chu
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-08 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 1:30 [PATCH 0/2] clk: spacemit: fix i2s clock Troy Mitchell
2025-08-07 1:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: spacemit: introduce i2s pre-clock Troy Mitchell
2025-08-07 16:19 ` Conor Dooley
2025-08-08 1:20 ` Troy Mitchell
2025-08-07 1:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: spacemit: introduce i2s pre-clock and fix i2s clock Troy Mitchell
2025-08-07 3:02 ` Haylen Chu
2025-08-08 2:10 ` Troy Mitchell
2025-08-08 3:59 ` Haylen Chu
2025-08-08 6:34 ` Troy Mitchell
2025-08-08 8:39 ` Haylen Chu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJW3uvqI--Bwrld3@ketchup \
--to=heylenay@4d2.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=inochiama@outlook.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=weijinmei@linux.spacemit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).