From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/vmalloc: Remove cond_resched() in vm_area_alloc_pages()
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:08:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJXMqrVCcdLBsMGp@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJSMfJhBOltRiSUh@tiehlicka>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 01:22:36PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 07-08-25 09:58:06, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > The vm_area_alloc_pages() function uses cond_resched() to yield the
> > CPU during potentially long-running loops. However, these loops are
> > not considered long-running under normal conditions.
>
> To be more precise they can take long if they dive into the page
> allocator but that already involves cond_rescheds where appropriate so
> these are not needed in fact.
>
> > In non-blocking
> > contexts, calling cond_resched() is inappropriate also.
> >
> > Remove these calls to ensure correctness for blocking/non-blocking
> > contexts. This also simplifies the code path. In fact, a slow path
> > of page allocator already includes reschedule points to mitigate
> > latency.
> >
> > This patch was tested for !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel and with large
> > allocation chunks(~1GB), without triggering any "BUG: soft lockup"
> > warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
Updated the commit message. Right, it can take long time.
Thank you!
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-08 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 7:58 [PATCH 0/8] __vmalloc() and no-block support Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] lib/test_vmalloc: add no_block_alloc_test case Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] lib/test_vmalloc: Remove xfail condition check Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in alloc_vmap_area() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 9:59 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/vmalloc: Remove cond_resched() in vm_area_alloc_pages() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:22 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 10:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-08-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/kasan, mm/vmalloc: Respect GFP flags in kasan_populate_vmalloc() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 16:05 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2025-08-08 10:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmalloc: Defer freeing partly initialized vm_struct Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:25 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 10:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 4:21 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-18 13:02 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-19 8:56 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-19 9:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/vmalloc: Support non-blocking GFP flags in __vmalloc_area_node() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:54 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 11:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-18 4:35 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-18 13:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-19 8:46 ` Baoquan He
2025-08-07 7:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: Drop __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM flag if PF_MEMALLOC is set Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-08-07 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 13:12 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-08 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-08 16:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-07 11:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] __vmalloc() and no-block support Marco Elver
2025-08-08 8:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-23 9:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJXMqrVCcdLBsMGp@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).