From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Subrata Nath (Nokia)" <subrata.nath@nokia.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: prevent RCU stalls in kswapd by adding cond_resched()
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 18:53:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJeLGpT9vp7g0lj4@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250809103845.21ca58f0a97c0c1f61c0879c@linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 10:38:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 16:09:12 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 11:59:16AM +0000, Subrata Nath (Nokia) wrote:
> > > Fix this by adding cond_resched() after all spinlock release points
> > > in page_vma_mapped_walk() and in the main loop of shrink_zones().
> > > These calls, placed outside spinlock-held sections, allow voluntary
> > > scheduling and ensure timely quiescent state reporting, avoiding
> > > prolonged RCU stalls.
> >
> > No. We're removing cond_resched(). See
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/87cyyfxd4k.ffs@tglx/
> > and many many other emails over the past few years.
>
> tglx's email was sent two years ago.
... and there has been much progress since then. Most recently,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225035516.26443-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
This report is not from a recent kernel. Subrata was good enough to
include:
Based on: v6.1.128
and I think it is very much on them to prove that this is still a
problem in 2025.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-09 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-09 11:59 [PATCH] mm: prevent RCU stalls in kswapd by adding cond_resched() Subrata Nath (Nokia)
2025-08-09 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-09 17:38 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-09 17:53 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-08-10 1:56 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJeLGpT9vp7g0lj4@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=subrata.nath@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).