From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, nh-open-source@amazon.com,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:39:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJmQNuQxLLtXjq2r@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808163651.25279-1-epetron@amazon.de>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 04:36:51PM +0000, Evangelos Petrongonas wrote:
> When KHO (Kexec HandOver) is enabled, it sets up scratch memory regions
> early during device tree scanning. After kexec, the new kernel
> exclusively uses this region for memory allocations during boot up to
> the initialization of the page allocator
>
> However, when booting with EFI, EFI's reserve_regions() uses
> memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX) to clear all memory regions before
> rebuilding them from EFI data. This destroys KHO scratch regions and
> their flags, thus causing a kernel panic, as there are no scratch
> memory regions.
>
> Instead of wholesale removal, iterate through memory regions and only
> remove non-KHO ones. This preserves KHO scratch regions while still
> allowing EFI to rebuild its memory map.
It's worth mentioning that scratch areas are "good known memory" :)
> Signed-off-by: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
> ---
>
> Reproduction/Verification Steps
> The issue and the fix can be reproduced/verified by booting a VM with
> EFI and attempting to perform a KHO enabled kexec. The fix
> was developed/tested on arm64.
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> index a00e07b853f22..2f08b1ab764f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> @@ -164,12 +164,35 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
> pr_info("Processing EFI memory map:\n");
>
> /*
> - * Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there are any at this
> - * point, they originate from memory nodes in the DT, and UEFI
> - * uses its own memory map instead.
> + * Discard memblocks discovered so far except for KHO scratch regions.
> + * Most memblocks at this point originate from memory nodes in the DT,
> + * and UEFI uses its own memory map instead. However, if KHO is enabled,
> + * scratch regions must be preserved.
> */
> memblock_dump_all();
> - memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH)) {
It's better to condition this on kho_get_fdt() that means that we are
actually doing a handover.
> + struct memblock_region *reg;
> + phys_addr_t start, size;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Remove all non-KHO regions */
> + for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Please use for_each_mem_region()
> + reg = &memblock.memory.regions[i];
> + if (!memblock_is_kho_scratch(reg)) {
> + start = reg->base;
> + size = reg->size;
> + memblock_remove(start, size);
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * KHO is disabled. Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there
> + * are any at this point, they originate from memory nodes in the
> + * DT, and UEFI uses its own memory map instead.
> + */
> + memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> + }
>
> for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> paddr = md->phys_addr;
> --
> 2.43.0
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 16:36 [PATCH] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-11 6:39 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-08-14 0:53 ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-14 8:51 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJmQNuQxLLtXjq2r@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=epetron@amazon.de \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).