From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
z00813676 <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJo5vP_mfBn_vxSF@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7>
On Aug 11 11:35, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 06-08-25, 17:19, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > So, do we have consensus that the idle check is acceptable as proposed?
> > (Just want to make sure this thread doesn't get lost given another thread
> > has forked off in this conversation).
>
> I don't have any objections to this or a better solution to this.
Thanks Viresh! Beata, can we kindly move ahead with the idle
optimization (which is this series), while we continue discussions for
the "under load" scenarios on the other thread?
BR,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 0:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: CPPC: idle cpu perf handling Prashant Malani
2025-06-19 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Expose idle_cpu() to modules Prashant Malani
2025-06-19 0:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs Prashant Malani
2025-06-20 3:53 ` Jie Zhan
2025-06-20 5:07 ` Prashant Malani
2025-06-26 18:42 ` Prashant Malani
2025-06-27 7:54 ` Jie Zhan
2025-06-27 17:07 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-02 18:38 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-03 9:29 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-07 8:32 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-09 17:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-09 22:49 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-14 9:30 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-15 6:28 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-21 17:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-21 19:40 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-22 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-07-22 6:02 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-30 7:31 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-31 8:27 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-31 11:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-07-31 20:23 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-01 4:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-07 0:19 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-11 6:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-08-11 18:43 ` Prashant Malani [this message]
2025-08-11 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-11 20:01 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-14 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-15 5:12 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-16 8:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-13 10:12 ` Beata Michalska
2025-07-31 16:51 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-31 20:30 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-01 9:16 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-04 20:55 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-06 7:21 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-07 0:01 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-07 10:24 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-08 2:14 ` Prashant Malani
2025-08-13 10:15 ` Beata Michalska
2025-08-13 22:25 ` Prashant Malani
2025-07-07 8:35 ` Beata Michalska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJo5vP_mfBn_vxSF@google.com \
--to=pmalani@google.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).