linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	 Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: rseq selftests and librseq vs. glibc fail
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:46:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKODByTQMYFs3WVN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lhuwm70qvac.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 18 2025 at 16:15, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Thomas Gleixner:
> >>> It's trivial to reproduce. All it needs is to have in the source:
> >>>
> >>> __weak ptrdiff_t __rseq_offset;
> >>>
> >>> w/o even being referenced and creating a pthread. Reproducer below.
> >>
> >> Well, that's sort of expected.  You can't define glibc symbols that are
> >> not intended for interposition and expect things to work.  It's kind of
> >> like writing:
> >>
> >> int _rtld_global;
> >>
> >> That's going to fail rather spectaculary, too.  We make an exception for
> >> symbols that are not reserved (you can build in ISO C mode and define
> >> open, close, etc., at least as long as you link to glibc only).  But
> >> __rseq_offset is a reserved name, so that is not applicable here.
> >>
> >> The real change here is GCC changing from -fcommon (which made a lot of
> >> these things work in the past) to -fno-common.
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation!
> >
> > So the only way to make this actually work is to revert that commit and
> > the folks who want to link that statically need to come up with:
> >
> > #ifdef _BUILD_STATICALLY
> > extern ....
> >
> > #else
> >         ptr = dlsym(...);
> > #endif
> >
> > or something daft like that. A proper function interface would avoid all
> > that nonsense, but we can't have nice things or can we?
> 
> I don't understand why a function would be different.  Well, a function
> *declaration* would be implicitly extern, in a way a variable
> declaration is not (without -fcommon).  Maybe it's just about the
> missing extern keyword?
> 
> You could add the extern keyword and check &__rseq_offset for NULL if
> you want to probe for the availability of the signal?

That will fail to link if the glibc version doesn't support rseq in any capacity,
which is why I added the __weak crud.

>Or use:
> 
> #if __has_include(<sys/rseq.h>)
> #include <sys/rseq.h>
> /* Code that depends on glibc's rseq support goes here. */

FWIW, the code in question doesn't depend on rseq per se, rather the problem is
that attempting to register a restartable sequence fails if glibc has already
"claimed" rseq.

What about something horrific like this?  Or if __has_include(<sys/rseq.h>) is
preferrable to checking the glibc version, go with that.  The idea with checking
LIBC_RSEQ_STATIC_LINK is to give folks a way to force static linking if their
libc registers rseq, but doesn't satisfy the glibc version checks for whatever
reason.

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
index 663a9cef1952..1a88352fcff3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
@@ -36,17 +36,18 @@
 #include "../kselftest.h"
 #include "rseq.h"
 
-/*
- * Define weak versions to play nice with binaries that are statically linked
- * against a libc that doesn't support registering its own rseq.
- */
-__weak ptrdiff_t __rseq_offset;
-__weak unsigned int __rseq_size;
-__weak unsigned int __rseq_flags;
+#if defined(LIBC_RSEQ_STATIC_LINK) || __GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 35)
+extern ptrdiff_t __rseq_offset;
+extern unsigned int __rseq_size;
+extern unsigned int __rseq_flags;
+#define GLIBC_RSEQ_PTR(x) &x
+#else
+#define GLIBC_RSEQ_PTR(x) NULL
+#endif
 
-static const ptrdiff_t *libc_rseq_offset_p = &__rseq_offset;
-static const unsigned int *libc_rseq_size_p = &__rseq_size;
-static const unsigned int *libc_rseq_flags_p = &__rseq_flags;
+static const ptrdiff_t *libc_rseq_offset_p = GLIBC_RSEQ_PTR(__rseq_offset);
+static const unsigned int *libc_rseq_size_p = GLIBC_RSEQ_PTR(__rseq_size);
+static const unsigned int *libc_rseq_flags_p = GLIBC_RSEQ_PTR(__rseq_flags);
 
 /* Offset from the thread pointer to the rseq area. */
 ptrdiff_t rseq_offset;
@@ -209,7 +210,7 @@ void rseq_init(void)
         * libc not having registered a restartable sequence.  Try to find the
         * symbols if that's the case.
         */
-       if (!*libc_rseq_size_p) {
+       if (!libc_rseq_size_p || !*libc_rseq_size_p) {
                libc_rseq_offset_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_offset");
                libc_rseq_size_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_size");
                libc_rseq_flags_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_flags");

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13 16:29 [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 01/11] rseq: Avoid pointless evaluation in __rseq_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:23   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 02/11] rseq: Condense the inline stubs Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:24   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 03/11] rseq: Rename rseq_syscall() to rseq_debug_syscall_exit() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 04/11] rseq: Replace the pointless event mask bit fiddling Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 05/11] rseq: Optimize the signal delivery path Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 06/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space further Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 07/11] entry: Cleanup header Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:09   ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-13 21:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 08/11] entry: Distinguish between syscall and interrupt exit Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 09/11] entry: Provide exit_to_user_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 10/11] rseq: Skip fixup when returning from a syscall Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-14  8:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-14 13:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 11/11] rseq: Convert to masked user access where applicable Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:45 ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 21:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 21:36     ` Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 22:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-17 21:23         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:00           ` BUG: rseq selftests and librseq vs. glibc fail Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:15             ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 17:13               ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 19:33                 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 19:46                   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-08-18 19:55                     ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 20:27                       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 23:54                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-19  0:28                           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-19  6:18                             ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-29 18:44                 ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-29 18:50                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-09-01 19:30                     ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-18 17:38           ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 20:21             ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 21:29               ` Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 23:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:27           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-20 14:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKODByTQMYFs3WVN@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mjeanson@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sthibault@debian.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).