linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()
@ 2025-08-19  9:41 Dan Carpenter
  2025-08-19 14:32 ` [External] : " Mark Tinguely
  2025-08-20  5:34 ` Joseph Qi
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-08-19  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Fasheh
  Cc: Joel Becker, Joseph Qi, ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel,
	kernel-janitors

Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
because it has already been dereferenced at this point.  Really passing a
NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
fortunately none of the callers do that.  Delete the unnecessary NULL
check.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 
 out:
 	if (ret != 0) {
-		if (folios)
-			ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
+		ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
 		numfolios = 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [External] : [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()
  2025-08-19  9:41 [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios() Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-08-19 14:32 ` Mark Tinguely
  2025-08-20  5:34 ` Joseph Qi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Tinguely @ 2025-08-19 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Mark Fasheh
  Cc: Joel Becker, Joseph Qi, ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel,
	kernel-janitors

On 8/19/25 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
> because it has already been dereferenced at this point.  Really passing a
> NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
> fortunately none of the callers do that.  Delete the unnecessary NULL
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
>   fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
>   
>   out:
>   	if (ret != 0) {
> -		if (folios)
> -			ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
> +		ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
>   		numfolios = 0;
>   	}
>   

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()
  2025-08-19  9:41 [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios() Dan Carpenter
  2025-08-19 14:32 ` [External] : " Mark Tinguely
@ 2025-08-20  5:34 ` Joseph Qi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2025-08-20  5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Mark Fasheh, akpm
  Cc: Joel Becker, ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors



On 2025/8/19 17:41, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
> because it has already been dereferenced at this point.  Really passing a
> NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
> fortunately none of the callers do that.  Delete the unnecessary NULL
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
>  
>  out:
>  	if (ret != 0) {
> -		if (folios)
> -			ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
> +		ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
>  		numfolios = 0;
>  	}
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-20  5:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-19  9:41 [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios() Dan Carpenter
2025-08-19 14:32 ` [External] : " Mark Tinguely
2025-08-20  5:34 ` Joseph Qi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).