From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@arm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, Prachotan.Bathi@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: Add idle support for the Arm FF-A start method
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 01:49:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKzoaWeJOh5W0M6J@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9227d35b-40d6-4faf-910d-ee7de9bbc094@arm.com>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 05:19:34PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>
>
> On 8/25/25 4:58 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 03:59:43PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > > According to the CRB over FF-A specification [1], a TPM that implements
> > > the ABI must comply with the TCG PTP specification. This requires support
> > > for the Idle and Ready states.
> > >
> > > This patch implements CRB control area requests for goIdle and
> > > cmdReady on FF-A based TPMs.
> > >
> > > The FF-A message used to notify the TPM of CRB updates includes a
> > > locality parameter, which provides a hint to the TPM about which
> > > locality modified the CRB. This patch adds a locality parameter
> > > to __crb_go_idle() and __crb_cmd_ready() to support this.
> > >
> > > [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0138/latest/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@arm.com>
> >
> > Perhaps a dummy question but is this "QEMU testable"? I know how
> > to bind swtpm to QEMU and make it appear as CRB device on x86-64.
> >
> > I don't see much testing happening with these ARM CRB patches,
> > and if that works in the first palce I could probably add
> > a new board target to my BR2_EXTERNAL [1].
> >
> > I can of course do "negative testing' i.e. that these don't
> > break x86 ;-)
>
> Unfortunately this is not currently testable on QEMU. We are using
> the Arm FVP [1], which is also a machine emulator, with the firmware
> stack and an fTPM running in TrustZone. The firmware, fTPM, etc are
> not all publicly available yet, but everything is based on open
> source projects and the intent is that all the components needed do
> test this on FVP will be available at some point.
>
> There is nothing fundamental that would prevent this from running
> on QEMU, but just a fair amount of integration and possibly firmware
> work.
OK, it's cool and the patch looks totally fine and I can
"hallucinate it" so:
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/Tools%20and%20Software/Fixed%20Virtual%20Platforms/Arm%20Architecture%20FVPs
>
> Thanks,
> Stuart
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 20:59 [PATCH] tpm_crb: Add idle support for the Arm FF-A start method Stuart Yoder
2025-08-25 21:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-08-25 22:19 ` Stuart Yoder
2025-08-25 22:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKzoaWeJOh5W0M6J@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=Prachotan.Bathi@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stuart.yoder@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).