From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8739443 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757322508; cv=none; b=Kj+f2oU1W7RUxWQX8bDC8FY2rZDgW6eVSurEt60Rb1eYPeRGKyK1o/Ec/GQl3irmit+dKS2p1q8RnGE2TGLVJuj7oPGvXVwIAj/Yrseb2yxD53n4TR62A5EvgA78aiLJCcFrSntk+Ajz4cgdz1GMyC8wSCfJ82Fy4SdwfSlVBYw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757322508; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p3axqcSjIgpt/G/0E6xuXsP7YLEdi6L+lrwMOhDGpls=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RKDDi/UPOqmBRfnpWEzdTWPwOP5NYwCnktoWBaRrQi4PN+REIrXS42gprrO50/HQ7TvCNrGwhEd9ls5qu4IprV54TeTO1ZTIcS5WoopgN22HLdFpuUGueFi3FJDjWztuOK6FtxIED2Y4dKpvTbkCyyZ/hguI17hFWXXkZtypr7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=HgOXjDJw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="HgOXjDJw" Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45cb5e5e71eso20092845e9.2 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 02:08:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1757322504; x=1757927304; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CXAkEc+0hbVrwg0zBjiBl7uCpRmywegXjmBSprSMPqA=; b=HgOXjDJwmTc0jGXmEcPxlfACKwwcKHGqBNKQcdISagRZLy/X/SjzHwNekqKKT5puOb JEQ+bqGQgdECfbckkg5ZAmX623kd5u8dGbH9wcRa92e17O+OSXS6WjAgJxjxaY0TpmSc 4ateAliliTpTZdV2QjiB+Mh2AvXVpMOVgTx1AE7V0dCIeSwGUww4cwro/EXOLD00s9C0 D04EsAq97/z9L7C+KA3v9ZnhzAWg2K3D0CSCZOhLsJguABWVEBhyBSP+zoNAH3tVvmXn 3HUguXB1XL2IVqJ81BDuYLXdr4/Da7UkCyRFOI5UWHHDA+IzzFGxlA1YOobSHItVTjWl XXHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757322504; x=1757927304; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CXAkEc+0hbVrwg0zBjiBl7uCpRmywegXjmBSprSMPqA=; b=chF5xxCQQZDEvPfK2weC1aqX00acfifUgWggoFo7mOUscPk/RmRZD0DcAFvLLQL2Yc 1pZjPGscSpRPRH6rJo0gQ/k83CSfEPoLpX6KCRawaY1TkAiCVIujyFPumOoXAw2C7cXn EG66tFODUwAIB440D1fqztWCzG4Il0ZMEbSJa5PS+YFFdunNiBQ19FI4azqN0Hpp/wGt QIecAZKxLN0Aw5GA2pMIG6Qr1jwpn3EI5u+gGSfrOzyCNHwXK8O8hbYCcydPebOAWhde K5zRuOQQOLrYhpkSEEjb9iqxwBRuKVtWgMOuO4rtcn3RmuL0xn+lcV23QdzRVKQomHcZ c2YQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU9IB6dHBjFaSt+TTYdzozLi84dPCd92X6KA9gBRxl4E9Jcel893xAcxwxg1+UWwldFJOBEI3VSLO4pNeQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMJyrVf9PZSKdrS1HsaWVMkxPItCd5NNLGh8hduR30OKvniQUa TcgB/K2igYvZ3iQ2FDX5p9vaoDkGt1a2SSi/lN/fVa5weuvwjVI2IUILPpoajZDoLos= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctTVV579obytEqyBMPqvA6aFF6eRAgEflK87BokyJrZ1/WIFKajR7PiWnFOkeP Z/2Qfd60h9UNDl8TEnzjZnxWIiRJKEmkR6JD0vdbOj4/k6sBjmjqxQS72jdecNQPYbqP1TIZgJA W9Sp7dqaMcn9c0So8e9us58uzY+p3aj7dEfu0k9CiZeRh0OUhKtIxIbe8imeeR7xlAcE3/B/TqM r68RzZD7nHsng0PCrCw0+/fAQyTtDezNGKKK36DiE7kh++hmIKzzoh4RYtac0JR7YnvNhw4YrcP IPEYCFkOuHTDYafA7nmvEuhymM84zd++BwHlHmfFl76q/mvStbw+5me/jpepuU1teV0Y7DEzusx YsbaQDoFJLe9WuQaReweIwOXnGmX55A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjCdAP8Med5Uz3zM88YDI+0dw+kFhTAhqv2XIHSPraXCW8PtiZpKcSe5HEkCIs8k4Yh+M7Rg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3586:b0:45d:d13f:6061 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45dddec89e6mr70135545e9.30.1757322504380; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 02:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat2.prg.suse.com. [195.250.132.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b8f2d3c88sm300994075e9.19.2025.09.08.02.08.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Sep 2025 02:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:08:22 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Peilin Ye Cc: Shakeel Butt , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Alexei Starovoitov , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Meta kernel team Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: skip cgroup_file_notify if spinning is not allowed Message-ID: References: <20250905201606.66198-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri 05-09-25 20:48:46, Peilin Ye wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 01:16:06PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > Generally memcg charging is allowed from all the contexts including NMI > > where even spinning on spinlock can cause locking issues. However one > > call chain was missed during the addition of memcg charging from any > > context support. That is try_charge_memcg() -> memcg_memory_event() -> > > cgroup_file_notify(). > > > > The possible function call tree under cgroup_file_notify() can acquire > > many different spin locks in spinning mode. Some of them are > > cgroup_file_kn_lock, kernfs_notify_lock, pool_workqeue's lock. So, let's > > just skip cgroup_file_notify() from memcg charging if the context does > > not allow spinning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt > > Tested-by: Peilin Ye > > The repro described in [1] no longer triggers locking issues after > applying this patch and making __bpf_async_init() use __GFP_HIGH > instead of GFP_ATOMIC: > > --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c > @@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static int __bpf_async_init(struct bpf_async_kern *async, struct bpf_map *map, u > } > > /* allocate hrtimer via map_kmalloc to use memcg accounting */ > - cb = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, size, GFP_ATOMIC, map->numa_node); > + cb = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, size, __GFP_HIGH, map->numa_node); Why do you need to consume memory reserves? Shouldn't kmalloc_nolock be used instead here? > if (!cb) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > goto out; > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250905061919.439648-1-yepeilin@google.com/#t > > Thanks, > Peilin Ye -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs